Guess the Grade - Classic Commems

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by ddddd, Jul 12, 2016.

  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Guess the grade and if the coin got a CAC sticker or not.
    Do you like the toning? All opinions are appreciated. Thank you!

    (1)
    z1.jpg z2.jpg

    (2)
    z3.jpg z4.jpg
     
    Marine1 and Pap4tinker like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pap4tinker

    Pap4tinker Active Member

    I would only be taking wild guesses at this point in my hobby. However, I really like the first coin. I often think the toning on some coins looks bad, but the reverse toning is pleading to me. Cool coin, thanks for sharing.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  4. brandon spiegel

    brandon spiegel Brandon Spiegel

    1. MS 64 CAC PCGS

    2. AU58 PCGS
     
    ddddd likes this.
  5. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    The answers are:

    1. MS-63
    2. MS-64
     
    ddddd likes this.
  6. Coinlover67

    Coinlover67 Well-Known Member

    1.MS 63 CAC, very nice toning. One I would buy if I had the money
    2
    MS 60 toning does not look the best, and blocks me from truly seeing the coin
     
    ddddd likes this.
  7. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    62 and 64.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  8. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    1 - 63, pleasing toning
    2 - 64, I wouldn't buy toning like this.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  9. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I'll let you know later why this is interesting later.

    Big reveal tonight!
     
  10. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    Awww, crud! I was wrong??
     
  11. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Only partially
     
  12. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    Columbian 58
    Columbia 64 - Wild guess. No way to see the surfaces from the pictures with that much toning. I'm guessing eye appeal limited the grade on this one.
     
    ldhair and ddddd like this.
  13. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    brandon spiegel likes this.
  14. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    And the answers:

    371529-1.jpg 372861-1.jpg
     
  15. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    What was interesting about @brandon spiegel answer was that the grades and CAC were correct, just the coins were mixed up!
     
  16. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    Shoot. That 'Messy' fellow nailed it. :)
    Dang he's good........
     
  17. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Either that or the "hint" in post #8 helped :)
     
  18. mlov43

    mlov43 주화 수집가

    Okay. What makes the Columbian not Mint State?

    I couldn't look at it with a loop. That's my excuse.
     
  19. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    There appears to be some wear on the high points (like the bottom curls of hair).
    Although, I would not be surprised to see this coin in any holder between AU 58 and MS 64. The fact that it was in the 58 holder helped me pick this one up for a nice price.
     
  20. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    Sudden break in the toning on the brow and cheekbone were the big clues for me.
    I actually didn't see this hint before posting my guesses. The Columbia was a bit of luck. Obviously original, so probably not banged up beyond 64-65 surfaces, negative eye appeal with the toning for me, so 64 made the most sense.
     
    micbraun and ddddd like this.
  21. Marine1

    Marine1 Active Member

    I have collected toned coins my entire life and own many Morgans, these coins are to my eyes what my first beer was after Parris Island.
    Ill talk toning for hours at a time but not too many of my buds are left sooooo this board is a pleasure for me, keep putting up those tona lisa beautys.
    M1
     
    ddddd likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page