Guess the grade #67

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Sep 3, 2010.

?

1918- NGC Grade?

Poll closed Sep 8, 2010.

  1. 60

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  2. 61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  3. 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  4. 63

    2 vote(s)
    13.3%

  5. 64

    5 vote(s)
    33.3%

  6. 65

    8 vote(s)
    53.3%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1918- NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted
     

    Attached Files:

    rlm's cents, Sep 3, 2010
    #1 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    nice blazing red MS-65 ..Gem !
     
    ddoomm1, Sep 3, 2010
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. jerseycat10

    jerseycat10 Peace Dollar Connoisseur

    I agree. No distracting marks. MS-65.
     
    jerseycat10, Sep 3, 2010
    #3 + Quote Reply
  5. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Nice!
     
    BadThad, Sep 3, 2010
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    method dictated 66 for this one.... so will have to register max allowable... 65. if rims were teets, that cent would have Dolly Parton on the obv...
     
    bahabully, Sep 4, 2010
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    64 rd
     
    Leadfoot, Sep 4, 2010
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    Gotta go with 64 on this one. Contact marks aside, I just don't like the planchet enough on this one to give it GEM.
     
    jallengomez, Sep 4, 2010
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    65
     
    Duke Kavanaugh, Sep 5, 2010
    #8 + Quote Reply
  10. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    The glass is always half full with you isn't it? :D
     
    jallengomez, Sep 5, 2010
    #9 + Quote Reply
  11. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    It seems so on the internet at least ;)

    When buying this coin I'd call it a 62 though. I try to look at these like I'm selling them lol j/k
     
    Duke Kavanaugh, Sep 5, 2010
    #10 + Quote Reply
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    rlm's cents, Sep 8, 2010
    #11 + Quote Reply
  13. Coinguy56

    Coinguy56 Member

    It looks like a 65 but I would rather undergrade a coin than overgrade it, so I went 64.
     
    Coinguy56, Sep 8, 2010
    #12 + Quote Reply
  14. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'll go 65 as well. Sorry I missed out the last few weeks. Life has been crazy.
     
    ldhair, Sep 8, 2010
    #13 + Quote Reply
  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    That nick in front of his chin shows up better in hand than in the picture, but I still don't get it. It is not a 65, but why it is not a 64 I have no idea.
     

    Attached Files:

    rlm's cents, Sep 8, 2010
    #14 + Quote Reply
  16. Coinguy56

    Coinguy56 Member

    So close, I have no idea why that is not a 64 RD!
     
    Coinguy56, Sep 8, 2010
    #15 + Quote Reply
  17. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Stupid NGC trying to show how tough they are.....BAH. Every once in a while they slay one. Crack and send to PCGS and it will be a MINIMUM 64 guaranteed.
     
    BadThad, Sep 8, 2010
    #16 + Quote Reply
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page