Guess the Grade #571

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Oct 3, 2013.

?

1911- NGC Grade

Poll closed Oct 9, 2013.
  1. Genuine/details

    6.3%
  2. 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 63

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 64

    12.5%
  5. 65

    68.8%
  6. 66

    12.5%
  7. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1911- NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

    1911- NGC O.JPG 1911- NGC R.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ReaperRuler

    ReaperRuler Resident Numismatist

  4. aubade21

    aubade21 Well-Known Member

    I'm going with MS65RD on this one
     
  5. vlaha

    vlaha Respect. The. Hat.

    Finger print to the head.
     
  6. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    What is it about a finger print that makes you think it is only genuine? Lots of coins have fingerprints and lots of grade coins have fingerprints.
     
    rzage likes this.
  7. Stevenn57

    Stevenn57 Active Member

  8. jon12

    jon12 Young Numismatic

    I think the finger print is only on the slab.
     
  9. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I missed that, but you are correct.
     
  10. vlaha

    vlaha Respect. The. Hat.

    I consider fingerprinted coins to be "no grade" coins.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't "genuine/details" coins that have problems which the TPGs used to call no grade?
     
  11. vlaha

    vlaha Respect. The. Hat.

    Oops.:oops:
     
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Yes, "genuine/details" coins that have problems, but fingerprints are not considered problems. AU coins are typically cover with fingerprints - so many that you can no longer make out the individual pint. And those poor circulated coins probably have millions of prints, but all are graded unless they have another problem. Now a fingerprint will distract from the eye appeal of a coin and lower the grade, but it is definitely not a cause to call the coin genuine.
     
  13. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    I waffled back and fourth for a while then went with 65 since it was ngc. :) Just hope that is in.
     
    rzage likes this.
  14. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Nice luster particularly for a RB coin. It is nearly nick free. The O in ONE may be a bit on the weak side, but over all a pretty good strike. However, there is a spot on the 19 and several tiny blotches on the coin. Without those, I think it might have gone 66. With them, NGC gave it a 65. I imagine that it technically does not deserve a 66, but it is a nice looking 65 IMO.

    1911- 65 NGC SL.JPG
     
  16. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    I missed this one! 65RB sounds right to me.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page