Guess the Grade #569

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Sep 28, 2013.

?

1935- PCGS Grade?

Poll closed Oct 5, 2013.
  1. Genuine/details

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 63

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 64

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. 65

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. 66

    100.0%
  7. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1935- PCGS slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

    1935-a PCGS O.JPG 1935-a PCGS R.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Coinman1974

    Coinman1974 Research, Research, Research

    Wow would look great in my collection, however again Bag marks are going to lower the grade slightly. Can not wait to see the actual grades
     
  4. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    If in an NGC holder I would have went 67. This one is very nice.
     
  5. ReaperRuler

    ReaperRuler Resident Numismatist

  6. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  7. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Great luster and just a few very minor ticks away from a PCGS 67 . 66+ but a 67 wouldn't surprise me . Then again maybe I should check Heritage .
     
  8. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

  9. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Why AU - 58 ?
     
  10. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    everyone picked 66 , where's Thad ? He might go 67 . Car 54 where are you ?
     
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I have never seen you so united on a grade. Funny as I am not sure I agree. It has a dead solid strike, blooming luster, and I can just barely catch a single nick. I have seen coins with less luster AND a much poorer strike get a 67, why not here? I am not sure what PCGS saw, but they only gave it a 66. Not sure they were give +'s when this was graded, but at the least, I believe this deserved a 66+, However, I still think a 67 would have been better.

    1935- 66a PCGS SL.JPG
     
  12. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I came so close to going 67 on this one , even after looking at Heritage it looked close to some of the lower end 67s , if it was NGC this would have made 67 easy .
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page