Does ngs knock a grade down for less than perfect planchets the way PCGS does? im going 65 RB BTW I quit posting around #40 of these guess the grades, Unbelieveable that you are over #500 are these all your coins?
Maybe 2/3 are mine. And if you have a photographic memory, occasionally there will be one you remember from the past.
[quote="rlm's cents, post: 1789497, member: 7957" And if you have a photographic memory, occasionally there will be one you remember from the past.[/quote] ha! and if.......I can't remember what i had for lunch -no short term memory... then it stands to reason my long term memory works and that I can remember the grade of a coin you posted 18 months ago?
ha! and if.......I can't remember what i had for lunch -no short term memory... then it stands to reason my long term memory works and that I can remember the grade of a coin you posted 18 months ago? [/quote] I don't always wait even that long, but I doubt many could remember a coin I posted 3 months ago - and I usually take new pictures. That is why I stick them in.
Nice color , but those spots will bring it down to a 65 . And I don't remember what I just voted so I have you all beat .
Its a good think it has a little asterisk next to what I voted or sometimes I might have to look at several grades before I remember. And it is way to much work to go look for older ones that might be duplicates. I would rather guess wrong multiple times than do all that searching and comparing.
I keep getting a gut feeling NGC is going to knock this to 64...or if they really hated it, 63. One of many reasons I prefer PCGS for Lincolns.
I think there's enough luster to make a 66 if those marks weren't there . I mean nice strike , clean fields hardly any nicks , just those darn spots . If the reverse was like the obverse I'd go 66 .