Chicken! I'm betting it's not a big deal - not in a prime focal area and the reverse is almost perfect. A 4 pt deduction would not be fair for that tiny tick IMO. The fields and frosty luster are off the charts with this coin. I see halo luster around the portrait - that means strong luster.
LOL . You're probably right but everytime I looked at it it bothered me . I think it might be the large pics as I've been bit on a couple 67's by going too low for what I thought was a "big" hit , time to remember everything Dick and all you guys taught me .
I am not sure what you are looking for on this one. In hand, I see - nothing. I mean no nicks, no weak areas, no spots. I would guess that someone with real good eyes might pick up that nick in the left wheat, but I can't. Not that I am trying to knock it, but I think the luster kept it from a 68. Remember, even 68 can have visible (the the eye) nicks. (from PCGS MS68 "A nearly perfect coin, with only minuscule imperfections visible to the naked eye.") Anyway, PCGS gave it a 67 and I absolutely agree.
Remember when everyone's scores were below 0.50? At this rate, everyone's score is going to be above 0.50 NEXT ROUND! Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses. rzage 0.477 46 BadThad 0.488 45 mark_h0.500 50 non_cents 0.511 47 ldhair 0.567 32 jallengomez 0.594 34 MNcoinman 0.600 26 bahabully 0.674 48 ReaperRuler 0.681 49 petro890.696 48