Guess the Grade #524

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Jun 26, 2013.

?

1942-S PCGS Grade?

Poll closed Jul 3, 2013.
  1. Genuine/details

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 63

    6.3%
  4. 64

    6.3%
  5. 65

    56.3%
  6. 66

    31.3%
  7. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1942-S PCGS slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

    1942-S b PCGS O.JPG 1942-S b PCGS R.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

  4. ReaperRuler

    ReaperRuler Resident Numismatist

  5. definer

    definer definitely....! LOL

  6. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Weak strike, couple of obverse spots that may have developed, 66 but I'm not rolling the dice.
     
  7. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Close one here 66 without the spots , 65 with .
     
  8. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Tough call, I'll go with 65.
     
  9. Ten

    Ten Member

    I'll say 65 as well.
     
  10. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I am not sure how to explain all of this one. First off, it is an older slab. In the 15+ years since it was slabbed, I am sure those spots have gotten worse. Regardless, I can just barely find one (in front of the nose) of them without a loupe. It has real nice luster.. The coin is just about nick free. What you are seeing are the left over planchet flaws. None are visible to my naked eye. The strike may not be the best, but all the details are there and those wheat lines are strong. I am sure it deserved that 66 when it was graded and I still think it would probably get a 66.

    1942-S 66b PCGS SL.JPG
     
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Well, this week is a bit more stable. The first 4 positions stayed the same, anyhow. However, all the rest did their own thing. But I guess that is what happens when there is only 0.036 (now 0.083) difference between #5 and #10.

    Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses.
    1. Duke Kavanaugh 0.292 25
    2. non_cents 0.320 26
    3. mark_h 0.351 49
    4. rzage 0.369 44
    5. Leadfoot 0.380 26
    6. ddoomm1 0.419 33
    7. petro89 0.435 48
    8. ldhair 0.448 30
    9. BadThad 0.455 46
    10. bahabully 0.463 42
     
  13. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    LOL , I knew I should have went 66 , but getting burnt on that spot last week caused me to go conservative . 1 right 1 wrong again , this isn't good .
     
  14. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    I wanted to go 66, but PCGS is usually tougher.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page