Guess the grade #49

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Aug 9, 2010.

?

1958- PCGS Grade?

Poll closed Aug 14, 2010.
  1. 63

    5.9%
  2. 64

    29.4%
  3. 65

    23.5%
  4. 66

    35.3%
  5. 67

    5.9%
  6. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1958- PCGS slabbed

    BTW, die scratches on the reverse.

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    63+2 ms65 rd
     
  4. stealer

    stealer Roller of Coins

    Scratches+luster = 64
     
  5. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    wow... all those scratches will prevent this from going above 64 :devil:
     
  6. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Boy! Oh boy! Does that sound familiar.
     
  7. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    So you're telling us that all of those scratches are raised ?
     
  9. Shoewrecky

    Shoewrecky Coin Hoarder

    probably got a 66 knowing RLM however I believe it should get a 64.
     
  10. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

  11. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Die polish lines, but lots of luster. 67
     
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Not all, but most all on the reverse.

    Sorry. I missed this yesterday.
     
  13. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Die polish lines are parallel & don't criss-cross.
     
  15. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Extremely unusual. Either way, they completely destroy any eye appeal the coin would have.
     
  16. WashQuartJesse

    WashQuartJesse Member Supporter

    I've been voting according to how I think the TPG would grade (high). I can't for the life of me see how ANYBODY could grade this one higher than a 64 for any reason. No offense to the coin, its owner, or anyone else...

    IMO Lincolns get waaaaay too much slack. They say the eyes are the first to go...
     
  17. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I am not sure what to say about this one except it has all the luster you need. The lines are a lot less obvious in hand. I really don't see a big problem with this coin being a 66, but I don't know just how to handle those lines.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Lone 67 guess.....it's a nice coin. I was hoping to make a move up on this one, oh well.
     
  19. WashQuartJesse

    WashQuartJesse Member Supporter

    I've lost all remaining faith in PCGS's ability to properly grade Lincoln cents. With that said, I'm dropping out of any future voting. Thanks RLM. This has been very informative and I appreciate all the time and effort you have dedicated to this.
     
  20. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Because we agreed in another thread....

    I strongly disagree. Die polish lines are generally parallel. However, if the one doing the polishing rotates the die while polishing, they will criss-cross. This coin is an example thereof, IMO.

    Have fun....Mike
     
  21. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Disagree. If the die is turned then any previous polish lines are wiped out by the final polishing.

    Now - what you can have, and what most people mistake for criss-crossing die polish lines, are die polish lines that criss-cross with flow lines in the die that were created after the die polishing was done.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page