Guess the grade #462

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Jan 23, 2013.

?

1938-S PCGS Grade?

Poll closed Jan 30, 2013.
  1. Genuine/details

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 63

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 64

    15.0%
  5. 65

    45.0%
  6. 66

    40.0%
  7. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1938-S PCGS slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

    1938-S PCGS a O.JPG 1938-S PCGS a R.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. theSharpGun

    theSharpGun The King

    I love these man! Keep em' coming!!
    btw, I graded it at 65 RD
     
  4. Numis-addict

    Numis-addict Addicted to coins

    I went 65, but I just can't get used to TPG grades.
     
  5. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

  6. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    That is one serious hit on the reverse, but MS-66RD
     
  7. miedbe7

    miedbe7 Wayward Collector

    hmmm, pcgs, large cuts, i'm going 65 on this one
     
  8. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Going with old stand by of luster rules and give it a 66.
     
  9. ReaperRuler

    ReaperRuler Resident Numismatist

  10. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Nice luster, but I can't see PCGS ignoring those reverse hits. They are too deep.
     
  11. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I could see this one going 65 or 66.
     
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  13. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Nice strike, nice luster, and, with a couple noticeable exceptions, minimally nicked/marked. Those fields almost look creamy. Yes, those nicks are visible in hand, but, no, they are not major distraction as they appear in my pictures. PCGS still gave it a 66. Maybe not the best 66 I have seen, but I think it makes it.

    BTW, those parallel lines on Abe are not at all visible in hand. I finally located them with a loupe and suspect that they are planchet problems left since they are both on the high points and the recesses. If anyone else has an idea, speak up.

    1938-S PCGS 66a SL.JPG
     
  14. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    pumpkinpie rejoined the top ten and Irish2Ice opened up his lead. Meanwhile, most of the pack is fighting in that 0.4 to 0.5 area.

    Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses.
    1. Irish2Ice 0.237 40
    2. Leadfoot 0.300 32
    3. bahabully 0.409 23
    4. MNcoinman 0.421 20
    5. ldhair 0.429 29
    6. rzage 0.435 48
    7. mark_h 0.476 44
    8. BadThad 0.478 48
    9. pumpkinpie 0.516 33
    10. ddoomm1 0.521 50
     
  15. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Both right , I needed that . I figured the luster on this one would carry it . Dick on those lines I can't see anything else causing it , especially since they're not visible in hand . Must be planchet flaws .
     
  16. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    The deep reverse hits are more than I believe I've ever seen on a 66.
     
  17. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    Ooh, that's my first twofer in quite a while!
     
  18. miedbe7

    miedbe7 Wayward Collector

    0 for 2 BOOOOOOO
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page