Guess the grade #400

1915- PCGS slabbed

NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Au-58

 

58

 

I said 53 at 1st but I dont like the corrosion red color on the right obv. ,So genuine.

 

brutal one to call... somewhere between 55 and 63... too bad we can pick multiple options

 

HAHAHAHA.....baha going 60 to minimize slider point damage!

 

This woody is a TOUGH call, I can see 53-62....I might be better off to abstain. Hitting it will be a nice payoff, but missing it could be costly.

 

Between 58-60 on this one. I'll go 60 because it's a woody.

 

I'm not seeing any wear . Some color change but not from wear , I'm thinking 62 - 63 , going to check Heritage . I can't afford a 2+ pt error .

 

gave it a 62 but knowing RLM..its probably a 64.

 

au-58, a bit better than #399

 

lol... jump on in... the waters 'fine !

 

Woody's are BY far the toughest for me. I love all the comments and opinions, but it's very disconcerning that my opinions differ so greatly from those I respect so much. I see what I think is wear AND I think #399 is a better coin......SO.......logic versus gut on this one.....

AND YES bahabully, I'll be jumping in soon also.....

 

MS62 BN......this one's going to hurt!

 

If this goes MS, it's a later obverse die state. The master obverse hub was sharpened in 1915 and this looks a bit mushy.

 

Yes, they were sharpened, but I am pretty sure it was done in mid year. So, you will get coins both coins with great detail and mushy ones.

 

Hummm.....I don't remember, guess I need to get the books out.

 

My book did not say, but I swear I remember that from somewhere. And, I looked at Heritage and quickly found a couple that were either poor strikes or unsharpened dies.

 

That's a toughie.

 

You might be right....I don't know if I've ever heard that, but your research seems to back it.

I'm not taking a chance on this one, but I'll make an unofficial guess at AU-62.