Guess the grade #35

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Jul 24, 2010.

?

1938-S NGC Grade

Poll closed Jul 30, 2010.
  1. 63

    12.5%
  2. 64

    31.3%
  3. 65

    25.0%
  4. 66

    28.1%
  5. 67

    3.1%
  6. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1938-S NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. stealer

    stealer Roller of Coins

    63

    weak strike, scratches on bust
     
  4. PeacePeople

    PeacePeople Wall St and stocks, where it's at

  5. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

  6. I vote MS65. TC
     
  7. Tuffjump

    Tuffjump Junior Member

  8. majorbigtime

    majorbigtime New Member

    You call yourself rim's cents and can't grade 'em yourself?
     
  9. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Please join in Major. Can you grade them?
     
  10. majorbigtime

    majorbigtime New Member

    Let;s face it---grading is not scientific. On any given day, the top TPGs would grade the same coin differently.

    Kudos to rim's cents for his moniker--it makes sense.
     
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    majorbugtime,

    First off, one of the things my mother taught me was to identify the letters of the alphabet. Apparently your mother failed at this.

    Secondly, I think you will find I have guessed on most of these. Funny, but I have yet to miss one of my guesses.
     
  12. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    64+2= MS66 Red
     
  13. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    66

    luster wins over hits
     
  14. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    It never fails! All of the TGP's unfairly weight luster over hits and imperfections.
     
  15. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    When you look at a coin at arms length, what catches your attention first? A small mark that's perhaps 1/32 of an inch large and can hardly be seen without magnification, or the coin's luster?

    Therein lies your response to why I said what I did and why I disagree with your use of the word "unfairly".

    To me (and most coin collectors, I would argue), luster (along with eye appeal) is much more important when it comes to market grading (which is what the TPGs practice) than hits.
     
  16. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    +1
    Win!
     
  17. coinmaster1

    coinmaster1 Active Member

    Looks like a 64. The details don't show as much as a 65-67
     
  18. Shoewrecky

    Shoewrecky Coin Hoarder

    Dick I think it's a 64 but I am assuming NGC gave it a 65.
     
  19. Bitten

    Bitten Junior Member

    Those scratches are too noticeable 63 !!
     
  20. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Since your the second person to think those are post minting scratches on the shoulder/bust area, I'm going to educate.

    Those are on the planchet. That area is one of the high points of the design for the Lincoln wheat series. When there's not enough strike pressure, i.e. the dies are spaced too far apart, there will be a scratchiness in that area. As a consequence of this you will also often see the O in ONE on the reverse is not fully struck. When you see Lincoln with a lot of scrathiness in that area, the top of the O will typically be very weak. It is for this very reason that the mint lowered the relief in that area on the die down the road.
     
  21. PeacePeople

    PeacePeople Wall St and stocks, where it's at

    Thank you. I knew at some point I'd get educated about this, and it makes perfect sense.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page