Slight wear on the cheek, hair above the ear, lapel of the jacket and shoulder. The luster makes it look like a 63 to me.
Sorry, but I did not notice that it was so bad until I posted the picture. It has since been polished.
I would call the coin AU based on what appear to be scuff marks on the obv, but that is not one of the options given.
I would have to agree. Is this whats known as a "slider"? AND are sliders still considered MS? IF SO..how many grades is a coin docked for being a slider?
It has wear. Logically, it would be an AU, 55 or 58 to me. I'll say it is the legendary AU64, just to have a vote.
Doug the scuff marks are only on the obverse , that said , wouldn't wear from circulation be on both sides ? With the luster this coin has a 66 wouldn't supreise me .
rzage, I understand your argument and I myself am not a good grader, but how could one possibly grade this MS66 with rub marks THAT bad on the obverse?
If I was grading this , I would go 63 but since the tpgs especially love luster I wouldn't be suprised by a 66 . Seems luster forgives many sins at NGC . Remember there's ANACS 6th edition grading and tpg grading . Also most tpgs will look at a coin first with no magnification , then if needed a 3-5X loupe . Enlarged pics make a lot of rubs look 10 X worse than in hand . IMHO
I just don't understand that part. I'm a newb grader, but isn't overall appeal part of the grading process? How could luster be considered more important than rubs that bad? A scenario: Say I had a brand new mint 70 coin and put it in a felt drawer that I used daily for 100 years wearing all the high relief points down to the spectacular fields of luster. Is this still a MS coin?