Guess the grade #346

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Apr 11, 2012.

?

1938-s NGC Grade?

Poll closed Apr 18, 2012.
  1. Genuine/details

    8.0%
  2. 62

    16.0%
  3. 63

    12.0%
  4. 64

    20.0%
  5. 65

    24.0%
  6. 66

    20.0%
  7. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1938-s NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

    1938-S NGC a O.JPG 1938-S NGC a R.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. JCB1983

    JCB1983 Learning

  4. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    Slight wear on the cheek, hair above the ear, lapel of the jacket and shoulder. The luster makes it look like a 63 to me.
     
  5. pumpkinpie

    pumpkinpie what is this I don*t even

    62
    Products for clearing up headlamps on cars work well for making slab scratches unnoticeable.
     
  6. roll searcher

    roll searcher coin hunter

  7. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Sorry, but I did not notice that it was so bad until I posted the picture. It has since been polished.
     
  8. tristen1230

    tristen1230 New Member

  9. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    So those lines are on the slab ?
     
  10. jcakcoin

    jcakcoin New Member

    This one's going to be all over the map.......MS65 RD
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I would call the coin AU based on what appear to be scuff marks on the obv, but that is not one of the options given.
     
  12. Irish2Ice

    Irish2Ice Member

    I would have to agree. Is this whats known as a "slider"?
    AND are sliders still considered MS?
    IF SO..how many grades is a coin docked for being a slider?
     
  13. Numis-addict

    Numis-addict Addicted to coins

    It has wear. Logically, it would be an AU, 55 or 58 to me. I'll say it is the legendary AU64, just to have a vote.
     
  14. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Going with 65 .
     
  15. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Another tough one. Took a wild guess and voted 65.
     
  16. capercaillie

    capercaillie New Member

    Genuine/Details.
     
  17. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Doug the scuff marks are only on the obverse , that said , wouldn't wear from circulation be on both sides ? With the luster this coin has a 66 wouldn't supreise me .
     
  18. Irish2Ice

    Irish2Ice Member

    rzage, I understand your argument and I myself am not a good grader, but how could one possibly grade this MS66 with rub marks THAT bad on the obverse?
     
  19. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .


    If I was grading this , I would go 63 but since the tpgs especially love luster I wouldn't be suprised by a 66 . Seems luster forgives many sins at NGC . Remember there's ANACS 6th edition grading and tpg grading . Also most tpgs will look at a coin first with no magnification , then if needed a 3-5X loupe . Enlarged pics make a lot of rubs look 10 X worse than in hand . IMHO
     
  20. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  21. Irish2Ice

    Irish2Ice Member

    I just don't understand that part. I'm a newb grader, but isn't overall appeal part of the grading process? How could luster be considered more important than rubs that bad?

    A scenario: Say I had a brand new mint 70 coin and put it in a felt drawer that I used daily for 100 years wearing all the high relief points down to the spectacular fields of luster. Is this still a MS coin?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page