Guess the Grade 3.1 (1891-O Seated Liberty Dime)

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Mr. Numismatist, Jan 6, 2026 at 1:12 PM.

  1. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    It's been awhile since there was a "guess the grade" around here. Let's fix that.

    This GTG features three 1891-O Seated Liberty Dimes (none of which I own or have owned).

    Alert: one of these coins has a details grade.


    A)
    A3.jpg A4.jpg




    B)
    B3.jpg
    B4.jpg




    C)
    C3.jpg
    C4.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    A maybe, B perhaps, C could be? I'll go with the error coin, C Alex.
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
  4. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    MS62, AU58, UNC Details
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    A) MS-63
    B) AU-58
    C) Details and a nice die crack at 10:00 o’clock on the reverse
     
    Neal and Mr. Numismatist like this.
  6. Neal

    Neal Well-Known Member

    I agree with Collecting Nut on all three, unless B got the "details" grade because of the scratch above the cap.
     
  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I did consider that. In the photo, which is the only thing we have to go by, it looks to me as if the surface has been slightly altered.
     
  8. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I will agree with the distinguished gentleman on the first 2, but I'll call the third one AU details.

    There appears to be some *minor* traces of flattening on the breast and thigh, and friction in the fields. Now, that may be due to the cleaning, not sure. The area radially from center to k7 through k9 looks polished. Maybe spot removed? The spot where the rock is closest to the rim, k8, looks to have a remnant spot. Not to mention the area around k1 around the cap looks similar.

    One of the other biggests problem on this coin is the reverse... what is going on here? It looks like heavy residue, but I can't tell if it is leftover cleaning products, contaminants, or what?
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
  9. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    A) AU-58
    B) MS-62
    C) UNC Details
     
    ksmooter61 and Mr. Numismatist like this.
  10. samclemens3991

    samclemens3991 Well-Known Member

    I grade the first coin as AU-58. It does have signs of a very faint cleaning but I woul straight grade it so hope the TPG would too. I place coin #2 at MS-62. It does not appear to have full luster but gets points for full detail. Coin #3 looks to be uncirculated but has suffered some kind of enviromental effect. you can see the haze floating on the surface but could have been from any of a number of things. I can't spot any hairlines so my guess would be chemical rather than mechanical; ie cleaning. Nice coins all in all. james
     
    ksmooter61 and Mr. Numismatist like this.
  11. samclemens3991

    samclemens3991 Well-Known Member

    @masterswimmer . I make it a point to never look at other posts until after I have done my own thinking but i guess we sink or swim together on this one. james
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page