I am sorry, but this one I cannot explain. I is browner now that it was when I had it graded, but the luster and strike are solid. Aside from that nick on his chin, it is nearly nick free. I would think that should get at least a 64 and possibly a 65. Wrong. They only gave it a 63? HUH??? Even Doug thought it was a 64!
Just a bit of a shake up this week. The 0.03 is significantly widened and swhuck moved way up. He was the only one to get both of these correct. Top 10. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses. swhuck 0.479 50 rzage 0.500 28 bahabully 0.521 50 BadThad 0.522 48 Leadfoot 0.541 39 ddoomm1 0.545 35 ldhair 0.600 37 jcakcoin 0.694 38 mark_h 0.702 49 Shoewrecky 0.721 45
Whoa....tough grade, I can see 64 but not 63. I guess it just doesn't have that flashy luster.....then again, it's a 20's branch mint.