Guess the grade #278

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Oct 26, 2011.

?

1933- NGC Grade?

Poll closed Nov 2, 2011.
  1. Genuine/details

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 63

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 64

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. 65

    21.4%
  6. 66

    78.6%
  7. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1933- NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

    1933- NGC O.JPG 1933- NGC R.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Shoewrecky

    Shoewrecky Coin Hoarder

    66 nice coin RLM
     
  4. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    ty
     
  5. jcakcoin

    jcakcoin New Member

  6. amosamos16

    amosamos16 New Member

    I really enjoy this!! Thanks rlm. I would say 65. Beautiful coin but not enough luster to hit 66.
     
  7. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    MS-66RD...very close to 67
     
  8. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    The luster looks a bit subdued on the obverse but there's almost no hits on this coin.....very nice!
     
  9. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  10. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Nice 66 .
     
  11. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I guessed 66 for slightly muted luster. Coin's clean enough to garner a 67 if it was graded before the mellowing started. that's always the challenge with coins that look like this, IMO.
     
  12. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    The difference in voting pattern between this one and the 10S is dramatic.... anyone think this one is NOT 66 ?
     
  13. jcakcoin

    jcakcoin New Member

    Thanks for refreshing this..........forgot to vote
     
  14. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Maybe this coins luster appear a bit muted, but that is mostly because the coin is not red, but red-brown. The coin really has pretty good luster, great strike and absolutely minimal marks. As Leadfoot said, "Coin's clean enough to garner a 67". All in all. NGC called it a 66. Unless you go with 66+, I think they got it right.
     
  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Leadfoot still in the lead, but rzage has moved up to second as Thad drops to third. The second 5 played musical chairs.

    Top 10. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses.
    1. Leadfoot 0.474 40
    2. rzage 0.500 26
    3. BadThad 0.511 47
    4. ericgo 0.526 21
    5. swhuck 0.543 48
    6. bahabully 0.556 47
    7. ddoomm1 0.556 38
    8. mark_h 0.583 50
    9. ldhair 0.591 24
    10. jcakcoin 0.611 38
     
  16. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    wow..carrying out the decimals to the thousandths place and bahabully and I are tied. what are the odds :)
     
  17. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Dick good couple of coins this week , gotta admit though I missed the 1910 , I learned more from it . Thanks for these posts .
     
  18. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Lost two pts on the 10-S....I still say it's a VF. LOL
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page