Guess the grade #196

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Apr 20, 2011.

?

1928- NGC Grade?

Poll closed Apr 27, 2011.
  1. 61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 63

    11.5%
  4. 64

    26.9%
  5. 65

    57.7%
  6. 66

    3.8%
  7. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1928- NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jcakcoin

    jcakcoin New Member

    Time for the grade. Lincoln is dinged up, but it would end up with a 64RD
     
  4. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

  5. Animosity

    Animosity Member

    I agree as well, but with a 65 :)
     
  6. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Another tough one, but not nearly as hard as the other one this week...

    Two sided coin. Obverse has rim chatter and cheek mark -- which might be 1mm in length but jumps off the photo. Reverse looks a grade (or two) higher -- very clean with what appears to be the slightest hint of mellowing.

    My gut says 65 RD. I'm going with my gut, but I do wonder if they didn't grade it 66.
     
  7. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    p.s. RLM, how do you decide which grade choices you include in the vote? I've always wondered, and must have missed it if you've explained it before. :)
     
  8. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I just make sure that I include the highest I can see as possible and the lowest I can see as possible. And sometimes stick in a few to make sure everything is not typically in the middle, but that is not usually necessary because most people tend to under-grade the coins. I have gotten pretty good at guessing most of them.
     
  9. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Was going to go with a 64 but the fields are clean nice luster 65 .
     
  10. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    This is the first one where I remember being so drawn to a hit - the hit on the cheek. Just for that I went with 65 - still a nice coin. The worst part is that the picture could be making it look much worse than it truly is.
     
  11. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

  12. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    After 200 of them, that also makes you predictable -- I'll bet if we went back and did some analysis it would show you have a predilection to placing the right answer towards the top (i.e. position next-to-last and next-to-next-to-last). I know the high grade examples that you have present some challenges in doing so, but perhaps you should change it up a bit more often -- just a thought. :)
     
  13. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    On the high grades, you are probably correct, but just what do I do. All or virtually all, I list as 63 - 68. I get very few 63's and virtually no 68's. Most everyone knows there are no MS69's, so just what do I do with a MS67? I have got to include a 68, but I cannot include a 69. I think I am kind of limited there. What I do do is list the 66's just like the 67's. Now, 65's and below I do bounce around a bit and they generally have a wider span.
     
  14. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    beaut... 66, but the gash on the cheek nets a -1 almost every time from pcgs.. so 65.
     
  15. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    I'll give it a 65, but a MS66 wouldn't surprise me in the least.
     
  16. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    OMG!

    A voice from the past!
     
  17. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    NGC 65RD, PCGS 64RD. But I voted 64.
    Lance.
     
  18. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

  19. swhuck

    swhuck Junior Member

    What you said.
     
  20. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Howdy! :)
     
  21. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    HowdIEEEEE! You going to stick around for a while?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page