Guess the Grade- 1917-S SLQ TY1

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BigTee44, Feb 28, 2016.

  1. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    What do you think??

    IMG_4936 (2).JPG IMG_4939 (2).JPG standing.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Holy cow, that's a gorgeous coin! Is the reverse actually rotated as shown?
     
  4. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  5. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I'm going MS, and unless I'm missing a big hit somewhere, well into MS. It's nearly impossible to judge these from photos, especially with this kind of (beautiful!) toning, but I see no hint of rub on the reverse. On the obverse, there's just no telling without shots from multiple lighting angles, or seeing the coin in hand.
     
  6. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    My editing software kept crashing, so I just did a quick crop.

    IMG_4939.JPG
     
  7. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    That appears to be an attractive coin. I'll go 63, with a possible full head.
     
  8. Savy

    Savy Well-Known Member

  9. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    55/58 or 64 depending on if there's wear
     
  10. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    AU58 I like it!
     
  11. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

  12. mac266

    mac266 Well-Known Member

    AU 58!

    And WHOA!!!! That coin rates a two-syllable DAYUM!
     
    Kirkuleez likes this.
  13. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  14. charlottedude

    charlottedude Novice Collector

    58 FH, w/gorgeous toning.
     
  15. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Agreed. image.jpg
     
  16. Bill1517

    Bill1517 Active Member

  17. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    This isn't a series I collect so I'm not sure if the grade is correct. I didn't remember seeing anything that would make me believe it was a 61, the only thing I noticed was the mark on the right side of the obverse on the "wall" below trust.
    image.jpeg


    I'm considering buying it but this isn't a cheap coin in MS and if I bought it I'd want to cross it. Would you pay $360 for this?
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  18. mac266

    mac266 Well-Known Member

    I guessed AU55 because it looks like wear on the leg and boob. However, since ANACS called it MS61, I'm guessing there is no wear, but rather a lack of toning like we see all over the rest of the coin.

    To answer your question, Numismedia puts your coin value at $222. However, the "full head" designation and the unique toning would add a premium to that. I don't specialize in SLQs, but I'm guessing the asking price of $360 is still a bit high. If it was me, I might go as high as $300 if I planned on saving it for a long time and never selling. Again, I'm admittedly not an SLQ specialist, so others may chime in here.
     
  19. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I'm guessing that might be a type 2.

    I think if it's a 61 it's a fair price, but if it's a 58, then I'm in the hole even more after grading fees. I just don't know the series at all and don't even know what the difference between a 58 and 64 are.
     
  20. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    It is a type 1. The hair and the exposed breast is type 1
     
  21. mac266

    mac266 Well-Known Member

    The coin is a Type 1, for sure. the problem is, I LOOKED AT THE WRONG MINT MARK!!! Wow...rookie mistake. The correct pricing on Numismedia for a 1917-S type 1 is $300.

    So, I'm changing my story completely. With the full head designation and unique eye appeal, I'd pay the $360 your seller is asking for.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page