Guess the Grade: 1876 Seated Liberty Quarter

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by ddddd, Apr 3, 2015.

  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Here is a Seated Liberty Quarter graded by PCGS that I wanted to get some opinions on. All comments are greatly appreciated! Sorry, no multiple choice this time; this is one of those free response tests. ;)

    IMG_5210.JPG IMG_5211.JPG IMG_5218.JPG IMG_5232.JPG IMG_5234.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. carboni7e

    carboni7e aka MonsterCoinz

  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm thinking 58 but what's going on the right obverse field? Die polishing marks or is that just on the slab
     
    rzage likes this.
  5. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    I'm going with AU details cleaned due to what look like hairlines on the obverse, but it sure is a pretty coin anyway.
     
  6. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    +1
     
  7. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I can't tell if it is strike or wear. 55 or 62
     
    treylxapi47 likes this.
  8. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    AU Details if those are cleaning lines . If it's the pic I'd go 58 . It does look cleaned and retoned .
     
  9. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    unc

    Reverse is pretty
     
  10. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    +2
     
  11. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    I'll say Au details but..... you got a Misplaced date in the denticals under the six maybe more to left as it's bury on my tablet .
     
    rzage likes this.
  12. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

  13. treylxapi47

    treylxapi47 Well-Known Member Dealer

    There are three likely ways coins like this will fall.

    AU Details
    AU-58
    MS-62(61?)

    The fields look like they would take it down to details, but I've observed and owned several with a very similar look.

    And probably worth around $300 or so unless it's a major variety for that date.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  14. humma3800

    humma3800 Member

    I'm guessing 45
    the reverse looks better
     
  15. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    Looks cleaned and retoned. I'd give AU details, based on photos.
     
    coinman1234 likes this.
  16. UnCommonCents

    UnCommonCents Variety Collector

    My guess is AU details
     
  17. Gilbert

    Gilbert Part time collector Supporter

    Definitely a nice piece and one I would love to add to my collection. Forgetting the scratches, 55.
     
    UnCommonCents likes this.
  18. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    That is on the coin, but it looks much worse in the picture than in person (where it isn't that noticeable).
     
  19. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I'm glad it looks better in hand , but to the tpgs , hairlines from improper cleaning no matter how little will usually give it a detail grade . I have a 1825 half in Unc Details reverse improperly cleaned that I couldn't understand why they detailed it . But at a certain angle they are visible . If you look right above the eagles head there are hairlines , tiny and only visible fron a certain angle .
    [​IMG]

    Image View: Normal | Medium | Large

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2015
    JPeace$ likes this.
  20. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    PCGS called this one an AU 53

    IMG_5224.JPG
     
    Kirkuleez, rzage and coinman1234 like this.
  21. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    One of the things I was wondering is if there is any chance that this is a circulated proof coin?

    It's hard to show in the photos, but the coin has a mirror finish, especially on the reverse. Potentially just prooflike?

    The following photos try to show what I mean, but they still aren't the best.

    Any thoughts?
    IMG_5235.JPG IMG_5238.JPG
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page