Guess the grade #187

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Apr 6, 2011.

?

1926-D NGC Grade?

Poll closed Apr 13, 2011.

  1. 58

    2 vote(s)
    8.7%

  2. 60

    1 vote(s)
    4.3%

  3. 61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  4. 62

    2 vote(s)
    8.7%

  5. 63

    11 vote(s)
    47.8%

  6. 64

    7 vote(s)
    30.4%

  7. 65

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Page 1 of 2
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1926-D NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.
     

    Attached Files:

    rlm's cents, Apr 6, 2011
    #1 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mark14

    Mark14 Star Wide Receiver

    nice clean strike, 64 in my book all day long
     
    Mark14, Apr 6, 2011
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

    Awesome MS64RB! Might be an MS65 but hair details just don't look bold enough.
     
    iGradeMS70, Apr 6, 2011
    #3 + Quote Reply
  5. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I always get woodies wrong. :(

    Old print and woodie eye appeal results in a net graded coin with 64 (or higher) surfaces -- IMO of course.

    63 rb
     
    Leadfoot, Apr 6, 2011
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. jmon

    jmon Numismatist In Training

    63
     
    jmon, Apr 6, 2011
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. Animosity

    Animosity Member

    Gonna say 64 on this one
     
    Animosity, Apr 6, 2011
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. jcakcoin

    jcakcoin New Member

    63 rb
     
    jcakcoin, Apr 6, 2011
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    tuff on this one looks a little lower grade to me
     
    mpcusa, Apr 6, 2011
    #8 + Quote Reply
  10. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    64 obv
    63 rev

    Rev wins 63
     
    Duke Kavanaugh, Apr 6, 2011
    #9 + Quote Reply
  11. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    NICE! I'd call it a 64RB all day long, but the TPG's hate woodies everytime.
     
    BadThad, Apr 6, 2011
    #10 + Quote Reply
  12. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    63.
     
    jallengomez, Apr 6, 2011
    #11 + Quote Reply
  13. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    63 , because it's a woodie .
     
    rzage, Apr 6, 2011
    #12 + Quote Reply
  14. EyeEatWheaties

    EyeEatWheaties Cent Hoarder

    64
     
    EyeEatWheaties, Apr 7, 2011
    #13 + Quote Reply
  15. Shoewrecky

    Shoewrecky Coin Hoarder

    64
     
    Shoewrecky, Apr 11, 2011
    #14 + Quote Reply
  16. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    63 with no +1 due to the reverse weakness.... probably a mistake.
     
    bahabully, Apr 12, 2011
    #15 + Quote Reply
  17. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    rlm's cents, Apr 12, 2011
    #16 + Quote Reply
  18. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Aside from the wood grain, this is still a nice coin. I doubt that the weak strike on the reverse had much affect on the grade. Not many nicks and descent luster. I think it deserves the 64 it got.
     

    Attached Files:

    rlm's cents, Apr 13, 2011
    #17 + Quote Reply
  19. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Whoa...must look better in hand.
     
    BadThad, Apr 13, 2011
    #18 + Quote Reply
  20. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I guess they aren't that hard on woodies , thought 64 but put 63 because it's a woodie . Stupid question time , is a woodie caused by improper alloy mixture or sonething else ?
    Rusty
     
    rzage, Apr 14, 2011
    #19 + Quote Reply
  21. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Duke I have no room to talk cause you're kicking my behind . LOL But the obverse carries more weight than the reverse , I think I read 70% at least at PCGS .
    Rusty
     
    rzage, Apr 14, 2011
    #20 + Quote Reply
4 more messages...
Page 1 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page