Guess the grade #140

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Jan 8, 2011.

?

1952-D NGC Grade?

Poll closed Jan 15, 2011.
  1. 63

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 64

    3.3%
  3. 65

    3.3%
  4. 66

    20.0%
  5. 67

    66.7%
  6. 68

    6.7%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1952-D NGC slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.

    BTW, the marks on the obverse are on the slab not the coin.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    Another good one :)
     
  4. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    MS-67RD...very high end gem ++
     
  5. mralexanderb

    mralexanderb Coin Collector

    If all the distractions are on the plastic then I'll say, IMO, MS68RD. The strike could have been sharper. However a very nice coin.

    Bruce
     
  6. sro114

    sro114 New Member

    Another beautiful coin. I was going to say 66 but will add one since I've been missing the NGC coins by 1. By the way I appreciate the effort you put into your "guess the grade" posts. They are entertaining and a great learning experience.
     
  7. cubenewb

    cubenewb Consumer of Knowledge

    I went 67; just curious, is the reverse slightly rotated with respect to the obverse, or is that just a slight variation in photo angle? If it were to have a slight rotation, would that inhibit its ability to get certain grade?

    I second that
     
  8. Kevo

    Kevo Junior Member

    I gave it 67. Eye popper of a wheatie. Outstanding strike and luster. I Would not be surprised if it got a 68 from NGC.
     
  9. Stewart

    Stewart Searcher of the Unique

    MS66-RD

    The only reason I did not go to an MS67 was the
    tick on the "U" of Trust on the Obverse.
    And the quite common ticks on the "O,N and E"
    on the reverse.
    Love the strike Lincoln's hair looks great
    and what even looks like almost mint frost
    coming through on the beard.
    Otherwise even it being a photograph the
    luster of a nice 50's coin comes through.

    Thanks for posting this, It was fun

    Terry
     
  10. Shoewrecky

    Shoewrecky Coin Hoarder

  11. ratio411

    ratio411 Active Member

  12. ronterry

    ronterry New Member

    Agreed with many on a 67. The strike could be better, but not much!
     
  13. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    NICE! Supreme example!
     
  14. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    wow... 67 in any holder imo... i'd generally +1 for ngc, but not sure that method works well at 67 or higher..... nice tone, eye appeal, solid strike, clean, etc. etc... nice coin RLM.
     
  15. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    LOOK AT THE LUSTER!

    67 all day long.
     
  16. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  17. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    NGC slabs do not sow the luster as well as PCGS. I am thinking that these pictures and the 49- from PCGS show about the same luster. It is not. This coin wins hands down. It is a solid 67.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Most everyone getting better scores. I still cannot believe how well everyone is doing. Can anyone tell me if you are learning my coins or actually learning to grade from pictures from all of this?


    Top 10. Columns are rank, name, average, and number of guesses.
    1. bahabully 0.229 50
    2. Duke Kavanaugh 0.355 33
    3. Coinguy56 0.360 27
    4. ldhair 0.364 35
    5. Leadfoot 0.364 46
    6. BadThad 0.479 50
    7. mark_h 0.532 49
    8. ddoomm1 0.542 26
    9. jallengomez 0.563 34
    10. swhuck 0.591 24
     
  19. ikes4ever

    ikes4ever Senior Member

  20. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Personally, with more examples, I'm getting a better feel for how your pictures portray the underlying coin
     
  21. cubenewb

    cubenewb Consumer of Knowledge

    Are those names in any particular order? I'm having trouble seeing how there could be any pattern of "best to worst;" why isn't there a rank column?

    Thanks again for the fun I think this is my first one correct, haha.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page