# Guess the grade #101

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Oct 25, 2010.

?

1918-D PCGS Grade?

Poll closed Oct 31, 2010.
  1. 58

    20.0%
  2. 60

    16.0%
  3. 61

    20.0%
  4. 62

    16.0%
  5. 63

    24.0%
  6. 64

    4.0%
  7. 65

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1918-D PCGS slabbed

    NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    haha... who want's to go first ?

    I'm gonna have to go drink a beer first..... this is the toughest one I've can remember seeing so far.... 'really' smells AU'ish to me, dunno... let me drink on it.
     
  4. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    I've had my drinks...so I went 63
     
  5. eric0911

    eric0911 SMS-71

  6. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    Man I really really want to go 58 on this one... especially given it's pcgs graded,,,, but rlm's just hasn't broken the seal on AU's yet (unsure he even bothers with them),,, so will go 60, and then +1,, which is as low as I'm gonna go until I see an AU posted by rlm (can't remember him ever posting anything below MS). Anyway,, I see gunk, hits, poor strike, and what appears to me to be wear above the ear and other areas (or is that strike) (or is that cabinet rub) (or is that toning)... oh boy ! <hicup>
     
  7. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    This might be one you catch up then.
    G/L
     
  8. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

  9. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    I'm kinda doubting it.. lol... I've seen 58's that look like this one, and I've seen 63's that look like this one...... The only difference that I can see in them both is that I buy the 58's and RLM's buys the 63's..... pocket depth difference I think. ; )

    I like that the coin offers the potential for some delta's in the scoring,,, but I think you may be closer to actual than me on this one,,, but hey, if you never try to pass, you never will.
     
  10. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    My twisted logic - I thought 62 when I first saw it, but really not as ugly as I expected a 62 to look. So I bumped it one. :)
     
  11. bahabully

    bahabully Junior Member

    oh boy... I just noticed the low to no rim at 2 o'clock.... leading me to think that this one has strike issues and that that there is no significant wear (at least not by pcgs's definition)... Date and mm is strong... dang it....... I think I just missed a gear,,,, oh well,, die is cast.
    ... maybe I'll get lucky and pcgs will abide by thier strike to grade definitions on this one... any takers ?
     
  12. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    I have the TPG's on a coin like this!

    AU-63
     
  13. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I am surprised no one has said anything about the date.
     
  14. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Uh, ok, I'll play the noob.... What about the date?
     
  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    It is not a 1918-D. Look again.
     
  16. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    1948-d modified date?
     
  17. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Try 1918-S
     
  18. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    S, D, what's the difference? :)

    If it's not a modified date, what's going on with it? I give up.
     
  19. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    It is an S and not a D. That is all I am saying.
     
  20. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    lol
    I saw it but didn't think it was worth a comment...and after all this am really thinking I was right :D
     
  21. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I don't know what's the big secret. Guess I'll wait to hear. :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page