Gtg seated dime

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Mainebill, Jan 20, 2015.

  1. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    image.jpg image.jpg Gtg seated dime was a tough one to photo. Old ngc holder
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

    MS 60? just a guess through the toning!!
     
  4. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Gorgeous!
     
    krispy likes this.
  5. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    64. Boy is it tough to see marks on that coin.
     
  6. MKent

    MKent Well-Known Member

    MS61 but the toning looks like verdigris when I enlarged the pic. So I'm not sure it wouldn't be details environmental damage. Not an expert and really liked it until I enlarged now not so much, and that's rare for your post. In fact it's the only one I haven't loved.
     
  7. miedbe7

    miedbe7 Wayward Collector

    63*

    edit - purposely left it just a number bc that thing looks quite frosty on the devices. not a proof or proof-like is it?
     
  8. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Not a proof not a details. And an old ngc no line so pre * designation
     
    MKent likes this.
  9. krispy

    krispy krispy

    65
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
  10. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I agree, MS64, the toning makes it tough to see marks and evaluate luster.
     
  11. MKent

    MKent Well-Known Member

    Am I seeing things when I enlarge it or is that verdigris. It also looks like a couple of hits to the face and hairlines on the right side from the knees down. My MS61 grade may be the result of my over enlarging the picture is that possible?
     
  12. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

  13. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

    I need the practice. Due to what looks like wear on the face, 58.
     
    MKent likes this.
  14. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Pretty coin. I'm at 64.
     
  15. Gilbert

    Gilbert Part time collector Supporter

    Marks on the face are a definitive negative. But I would love to own it!
     
    MKent likes this.
  16. treylxapi47

    treylxapi47 Well-Known Member Dealer

  17. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    MS65. Nice coin!
     
  18. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

  19. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I guess 64. Nice!
     
  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Personally I think a technical grade of 64 is more accurate. Eye appeal great tho image.jpg Wouldn't surprised me if they graded tis one high to keep it from being dipped white and sent to pcgs.
     
  21. MKent

    MKent Well-Known Member

    Way to go on that one. I guess I was seeing things and have a ways to go grading the toners.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page