GTG Morgan purchase from ANA show

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ddddd, Aug 16, 2019.

?

What is the Grade on the holder?

Poll closed Aug 19, 2019.
  1. 58

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 62

    3.3%
  4. 63

    3.3%
  5. 64

    43.3%
  6. 65

    40.0%
  7. 66

    6.7%
  8. 67

    3.3%
  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Please guess the grade (and use the poll)
    (note: I struggled to get the ideal photo, so I included two of the obverse).

    I didn't include it in the poll, but please also comment on if it received a star or not.

    And bonus guess: what else is special about the coin?

    IMG_4050.JPG IMG_4043.JPG IMG_4060.JPG
     
    Johndoe2000$ likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    @ddddd

    What is that white spot (or lack of toning) on the obverse extending from the "S" to the bottom of her cap?

    Chris
     
    Ima Dragon and ddddd like this.
  4. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    I am not ashamed to give this a 67 grade from the pics provided. +/* are myth. ;)
    Is that the largest cud in history???
     
    ddddd likes this.
  5. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    It's an untoned area as far as I can tell.
    And @Johndoe2000$ no cud...that would have been pretty cool though!
     
  6. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Maybe someone sneezed on it and left it there while the rest of the coin toned.:yuck::yuck::yuck::yuck:

    Chris:wacky:
     
    ddddd likes this.
  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Solid 65.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  8. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    It's possible....there is no snot designation from NGC though :p
     
    Mainebill and Johndoe2000$ like this.
  9. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Only when they can't agree.....isstoo!.....issnot!
     
    PlanoSteve and ddddd like this.
  10. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    An older NGC may be MS64. I like it as MS65* today..
     
    ddddd likes this.
  11. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    MS65*
     
    ddddd likes this.
  12. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

    I give it a MS 66*. Looks like a interior die break on the obverse.
    If those are scratches on the cheek I'd lower it to MS 64. (Can't see the scratches on the first photo).
     
    ddddd likes this.
  13. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

  14. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    It's an '83 O ????
     
  15. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I went 64. Those marks on her cheek are pretty severe, even though the rest of the coin is terrific. Definitely not 66 or higher, as some are saying.

    I don't think it got the star, with that awkward white area on the obverse.
     
  16. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    It could well have gotten the star. I was on the fence about that. I went straight, solid 65, but the toning is really striking enough to go with the *. I would not be surprised with a 66 grade at all, which means that the “I hate TPGs” crowd would grade it as AU 55.
     
  17. buckeye73

    buckeye73 Well-Known Member

    MS 64...to much chatter on cheek-my opinion of grade. NGC grade MS 65 no star. For the record, I posted MS 65 in the poll.
     
    eddiespin likes this.
  18. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    Excellent toning btw.
    I didn't realize you had two GTG. I picked for your dream coin. Oh well.
     
  19. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I was on the fence between MS64/65 regarding surfaces but thought that the overall eye appeal would push it up to MS65. The untoned area on the obverse is unusual but I don't think it is distracting enough to negate the star, though it only takes one grader to disagree and bam, goodbye star designation, so we will see.
     
  20. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    This one couldn't go past 64 includes color bump. IMO.
     
    eddiespin likes this.
  21. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Yes, this is definitely an option I considered. I too was on the 64/65 fence.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page