GTG 44 Walker Half

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Pickin and Grinin, Dec 10, 2024.

?

What did ANACS grade this?

  1. AU58

    4 vote(s)
    17.4%
  2. MS61

    1 vote(s)
    4.3%
  3. MS62

    1 vote(s)
    4.3%
  4. MS63

    6 vote(s)
    26.1%
  5. MS64

    9 vote(s)
    39.1%
  6. MS65

    2 vote(s)
    8.7%
  7. MS66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I was setting up my wall display the other day. Realized that I didn't have a Walker type in my Soapbox Anacs slabs collection. I found this one yesterday. This slab is also, if I read correctly, the earliest serial number for Gen 3 slab with a bar code. It was the kicker for me to buy it for the slab collection.
    Hopefully the pics are clear enough.
    The serial number is 213226 with bar code.
    upload_2024-12-10_11-42-54.jpeg
    upload_2024-12-10_11-43-53.jpeg
    upload_2024-12-10_11-43-28.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    Oh man Pickin'.... I am terrible at these and buffalo nickels...... Despite this being an absolutely stunning coin, I believe I see the tiniest bit of wear on the eagles chest and lady Liberty's leg. As much as I don't want to, I am going to sat AU58, and I hope I am wrong.
     
  4. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    When I look to grade a Walker, I always look at the hand to see how well it was struck.
     
    Randy Abercrombie likes this.
  5. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    MS-64

    It's a 63/64 borderline coin. I'm not sure how conservative or liberal ANACS was back then, but I'll go with 64.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  6. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I agree that this coin is borderline MS63/64, but the photos make the luster seem very good so I went high, MS64.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  7. J.T. Parker

    J.T. Parker Well-Known Member

    MS-62-64 depending on the TPG choice
    J.T.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  8. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

  9. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I agree with 64.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  10. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

  11. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    MS63/64. Pics a little over-exposed, could be more confident with better pics.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  12. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Walkers have always been tough for me to shoot when there is nice luster involved. Add in a slab and they are like this or dull and detailed. I hardly ever hit the sweet spot.
     
  13. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    Very nice. I have no experience grading these. Looks awesome to me.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  14. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    She's a pretty one. The lighting just makes the grade a little challenging.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  15. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    You should check out eBAY. A lot of the big dealers are frauds when it comes to lighting. Not all but there is a basketful I'm aware of. I'll buy an inexperienced individual's attempts way before I'll consider buying from those. That being said, photographing coins is difficult. Ask anyone who has seen my attempts. :p Pickin's photos are great.
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.
  16. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    I've got a couple walkers that may be sliders but could also get a MS grade. My best looking one is in my 7070, but I'm absolutely awful at guessing grades on these. I voted 64 because it looks nice. Some breast feathers are worn and the left hand doesn't look promising, but the rest looks nice.
     
  17. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 63....great luster with some hits in the fields; maybe it got up to 64 but I think Anacs was more conservative on this one and said 63
     
    dwhiz and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  18. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    My initial impression was MS64 but then I compared it with my PCGS MS65 example, and I didn't see any reason yours shouldn't be MS65 as well. I voted MS65.

    But since yours is in an earlier slab, it might have been graded more conservatively? I expect that will turn out to be the case.

    I originally wanted a 1944 for my Walking Liberty type coin, because that was my mother's birthyear. But I ended up going with one from my father's birthyear instead: the 1938-D. It also happens to be a semi-key date, and thus was rather expensive in MS65.

    [​IMG][​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    lordmarcovan likes this.
  20. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Thanks. It’s fun to own a semi-key date that’s actually in a higher grade than some of the more common date pieces I’ve had in my past type sets.
     
    dwhiz and SensibleSal66 like this.
  21. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    If you're not too busy AND not to get off track too much, can you explain what makes a coin a key date or a Semi-key date. (No relationship jokes please. :rolleyes:). lol.gif
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page