GTG 1944-S

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by numist, Dec 2, 2023.

  1. numist

    numist Member

    Ready, set, go!
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    MS-66 Red.
     
    numist and eddiespin like this.
  4. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    When it comes to wheat cents, the die wear at the O in ONE is always a bit of a turn off for me, regardless, there are some planchet marks on Lincoln's shoulder and some bag marks on the reverse.
    It has good red color so I will guess 64 RD
     
    numist likes this.
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    numist and Evan8 like this.
  6. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  7. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    MS 65 RD
     
    numist likes this.
  8. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    MS-64 RD
     
    numist likes this.
  9. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

    MS67RD
     
    numist likes this.
  10. Coins4Eli

    Coins4Eli Collector of Early American Copper

    MS-65 RD
     
    numist likes this.
  11. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 66 RD
     
    numist likes this.
  12. robec

    robec Junior Member

    I’m in the 65RD crowd.
     
    numist likes this.
  13. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    I am not sure that is die wear on the O of ONE.

    The opposite side of the planchet is where the main part of Lincoln’s bust is formed. There is only so much metal available, so I expect that sometimes the O gets starved of metal and is simply not filled up during the strike.

    You can compare the clarity and the smoothness of the C just below it to the rough surface of the O. The copper was pushed all the way up into the C and its surface was smoothed and flattened once it reached the full depth of the C in the die. On the O, it is really the raw surface of the planchet pushed partway into the cavity in the die, so it doesn’t fully form the O. You can see how the surface of the raw planchet looks just like the flat surface of the O.

    01c  Planchet full 01.gif

    Detail of a similarly struck reverse. You can see that the O is not full height above the field, compared to the C.
    IMG_0697.png
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2023
    green18 and numist like this.
  14. numist

    numist Member

    I think Ron is absolutely correct in his reasoning for the weak 'o' on the reverse. I've seen several high grade wheats with similar strikes as this one.
    IMG_20231202_171802658.jpg IMG_20231202_171620291.jpg
     
  15. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Evan, I believe that’s from the deep bust cavity on the obverse die. Look at that flat LU in that same area. The striking pressure a little wanting leaves that, I believe.
     
    RonSanderson likes this.
  16. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    Sorry, define it how you want, still a turn off for me.

    If the weakness on the O in ONE, including the LU in PLURIBUS is due to the obverse design, then why Don't all wheats exhibit it?

    Later die states exhibit this weakness. Show me an early die state with this issue on the O in ONE. Granted 40's and 50's cents weren't exactly struck the best, which is why I mostly stick with early wheats.

    To me this is way more attractive:
    2017-08-07-10-14-06.jpg
    2017-08-07-10-13-10.jpg

    JMO
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2023
    Anthony Mazza likes this.
  17. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    Essentially I agree. I prefer the O to be full, so my coins are generally selected for their strike. Frankly, I am at a loss as to why this isn’t more important to the grading services, but I guess a lot of collectors like shiny things, even if that luster comes from using a worn die with flow lines and orange-peel surfaces.

    I think @eddiespin was on the mark, too. If you decrease the striking pressure, you can make the dies last longer. This is good for the mint’s budget. But it’s not so good for pushing the metal up into the die cavities. This would be independent of die state; a new die or an old die would both work the same.

    Here’s an early San Francisco reverse from 1911. Although the coin is dark and hard to see, I don’t see any flow lines or die wear in the photo. Yet, the O, PLU, and AME are all weak. It would seem strange to have a die worn in just these spots, but a strike with reduced pressure seems to explain it.

    01c 1911-S reverse 25.JPG

    Eventually the mint made the bust much more shallow, to the point where it almost looks caved in.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page