GTG: 1943-D Mercury Dime

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by jtlee321, Aug 19, 2016.

  1. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Here is a 1943-D Mercury Dime. Good luck.

    1943-D-Mercury-Dime-Obverse.jpg 1943-D-Mercury-Dime-Reverse.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

  4. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    Very nice coin, I'll do 66 but not FB
     
  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  6. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    67FB. I'm guessing it's in a no-line NGC holder and the toning occurred after certification.
     
  7. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  8. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Sexy & dripping wet! I'm at 67 but not FB. The left of the center band killed FB imo
     
  9. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    From the image provide it's hard to tell maybe a RPM ? I'm going out on the limb and say a 013.
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2016
  10. Coinlover67

    Coinlover67 Well-Known Member

    66FB

    Sent from my A463BG using Tapatalk
     
  11. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Yeah I missed that little tid bit at 5 30 am but I believe you're correct .
     
  12. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    Not FB but I'm in at 66. That looks like a little nic on the bands and that may have kept it from going 67
     
  13. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    65 no FB
     
    fish4uinmd likes this.
  14. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

    like chascat said...
     
  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  16. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    The luster appears to be the characteristic, flashy look of a late die state coin. There are no major marks, and very few minor marks. The strike is weak, especially at the lettering around the outside edge. However, I find the spotty, dark toning to be somewhat negative. I am guessing that it is in a 67 holder, but I personally would call it a 66 because of the eye appeal.

    The middle set of bands looks weak, especially to the left and right. Thus, I am going to say no-FB.
     
  17. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    It's a No Line Fatty NGC MS-66 FB. It has a CAC sticker. I think the black gunk is what held it back from getting a higher grade. The center band does have a very light hit that I am on the fence about, I know NGC is tougher on giving out FB designation than PCGS, but I don't think it would get FB at PCGS. I'm considering cracking it out and soaking it in acetone in hopes of getting rid of the black gunk. Under a loupe, I can see it's just sitting on the surface like it's some kind of residue like tar or something. Luckily the premium of FB in this date mm is not too big. It might be worth cracking and resubmitting.

    1943-D-Mercury-Dime-NGC-MS66-CAC-Slab-Front.jpg
     
  18. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

    Winner, winner...D&W roast beef dinner!
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  19. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Don't bother. I virtually guarantee it will not come off. My guess is that is left over from a previous dip.
     
  20. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    I lowered the grade a point because of carbon spots and the ding on left center bands. I bet this coin was brilliant when it was slabbed 25 years ago. These old soap bars seem to tone with time...something in the label causes a reaction...maybe sulfur in the paper. As for the band lines, it,s any graders call.
     
  21. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Yep. I have a couple of common dates in high grades in these holders that have this type of toning. Do I just leave them? I assume it will get worse and it is affecting eye appeal.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page