GTG 1938-D, 1939-, and 1951-D Lincolns

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rlm's cents, Aug 1, 2015.

  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Hint - there are 3 different grades here and none are +'s 1938-D 5 P O.JPG 1938-D 5 P R.JPG 1939- 5 P O.JPG 1939- 5 P R.JPG 1951-D 5c P O.JPG 1951-D 5c P R.JPG
     
    rlm's cents, Aug 1, 2015
    #1 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    66
    67
    65
     
    Rheingold, Aug 1, 2015
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    66
    67
    65
     
    ldhair, Aug 1, 2015
    #3 + Quote Reply
  5. NSP

    NSP Well-Known Member

    66
    65
    64
     
    NSP, Aug 2, 2015
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    66, 67, 65RED
     
    micbraun, Aug 2, 2015
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    66 RD
    67 RD
    65 RD
     
    Coinchemistry 2012, Aug 2, 2015
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Any more guesses? I will post the answers tonight. So far you are nearly 0-for.
     
    rlm's cents, Aug 4, 2015
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1938-D 67 5 P S.JPG

    Maybe nt the best 67 I have seen, but it is just about mark free.
     
    rlm's cents, Aug 4, 2015
    #8 + Quote Reply
  10. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1951-D 66 5c P So.JPG

    I would have guessed 65+ on this one, but it definitely has the luster.
     
    rlm's cents, Aug 4, 2015
    #9 + Quote Reply
  11. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    1939- 65 5 P S.JPG

    Sorry, but I don't get this one. There are several die cracks and die scratches, but they are not supposed to affect the grade. There is enough there I can believe it did not go 67, but I see nothing to keep it from a 66.
     
    rlm's cents, Aug 4, 2015
    #10 + Quote Reply
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
  12. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    I don't agree with them on this one either. It looks far, far better than the 65s I have seen (but granted I don't collect these in MS65 so take my opinion with a grain of salt).
     
    Coinchemistry 2012, Aug 4, 2015
    #11 + Quote Reply
  13. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I don't collect 65's either, but I have a bunch of 66's and 67's. That is above average for a 66.
     
    rlm's cents, Aug 4, 2015
    #12 + Quote Reply
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page