MS -64 sort of looks like the color of something crawling on a reef. LoL but I do like it eye catching .
I see bag marks on her face and eagle. 65 is out of the question unless the grader really likes the look. 63 and 64 are the possibilities depending on if the grader feels it has good eye appeal or not. Details if sent to NGC
LOL, I knew this one would be a controversial one. The toning is either a love it or hate it, but in hand she is still attractive to me, especially at the price and the holder she's in.
I like the color of the toning, but not the splotchiness. IMO, very tough to grade toned coins from pictures. My guess is 63/64.
I think i saw this one on ebay. I couldnt pull the trigger on it though. I cant remeber the grade, so i will go 64
MS63, but difficult to grade from photos. Plenty of hidden hits, maybe a few more we can't see. If insanely lustrous, maybe 64. Flashy luster under that kind of toning can be very nice. Toning alone to me isn't positive or negative.
Well, she's not a beauty in all eye's. But I won't mind keeping her away in my collection for the price I paid. Old ANACS White Holder MS-64. I'd call it a MS-64 "C" that may or may not cross at grade and probably would not CAC if it was in a PCGS or NGC holder. But I picked it up for only $30.00 which around here is cheaper than picking up an ungraded raw UNC.