GTG - 1919-S WLH

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Koincollector1, Aug 30, 2019.

  1. Koincollector1

    Koincollector1 Active Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'll go with 45.
     
  4. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

  5. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    +1. Some wear but some luster.
     
  6. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Tough one here . . . the coin was cleaned as is evident from the abrupt decrease in luster so close to the nearly full devices. Still, I think it is market acceptable, but not as an AU . . . XF45.
     
  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  8. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    AU 53.
    Nice lustre.
     
  9. Stevearino

    Stevearino Well-Known Member

    45. Likely straight graded; I'd probably take a shot at it if I needed it.

    Steve
     
  10. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    I dunno. I'm at '53 but I'm an idiot when it comes to these......
     
  11. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

  12. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

  13. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

  14. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    I think they netted it to 40.
     
  15. FrankHKP7

    FrankHKP7 Active Member

    Damaged, XF details. Looks like a rolling machine smeared the date.
     
  16. Koincollector1

    Koincollector1 Active Member

    Not my coin, Grade posted

    17EEFF7C-8F32-47C3-9925-CA1D5BA3F848.png
     
    longshot likes this.
  17. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    I was thinking XF, but since I'm not Ed Wood.....
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  18. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    Hey...that's where I learned how to grade.
     
    Johndoe2000$ and Stevearino like this.
  19. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I thought 50 cause of the remaining luster
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page