GTG 1900 Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ddddd, Jan 10, 2019.

  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Please guess :)

    zzzz.jpg
     
    heavycam.monstervam and 1916D10C like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

  4. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I'd call it a technical MS-63, but it was probably market graded as MS-64.
     
    JPeace$, SilverMike and 1916D10C like this.
  5. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    pretty rev, wonder how it toned like that?
    I'll guess 63.
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  6. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    It reminds me of the tab toned coins. I'm thinking it was some holder where the untoned part was where the coin was secured by the holder?
     
    cpm9ball and 1916D10C like this.
  7. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

  8. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    62. That cheek looks like it was bead blasted.
     
  9. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  10. ron_c

    ron_c Well-Known Member

    If NGC holder 64

    If PCGS holder 63
     
  11. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    It's a PCGS holder @ron_c
     
    ron_c likes this.
  12. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    63+


    If it was NGC 62
     
  13. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    I agree with @jtlee321, technical 63, likely graded a 64.
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  14. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    It has the cheek of a 62 but I'll guess PCGS gave it 63.
     
  15. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  16. SilverDollar2017

    SilverDollar2017 Morgan dollars

    MS-63, very nice toning.
     
  17. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

  18. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Anyone expect an MS 60?

    F0D8AA46-04D2-4060-BB6C-DA5A7B47DF0E.jpeg
     
    Santinidollar, jtlee321 and longshot like this.
  19. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I'm a little late, but I was going to guess 61 with a shot at 62. That obverse looks like she was left in a parking lot. Realistically, there isn't much difference between 60/61/62. In hand, some of the gouges are probably a bit more severe than the images show.

    This is a coin where I would have thought the reverse would pull it up a bit (hence the 61/62 guess).
     
    1916D10C and jtlee321 like this.
  20. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    Nope. Was definitely fooled by the pics. How's the luster? Looks fairly muted in your last pic.
     
  21. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I was not expecting MS-60. I think of the MS-60 grade as "it's uncirculated, but trust me you don't want it." You don't see MS-60's handed out too often. Did you get a good deal on it?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page