GTG: 1897 Quarter Eagle

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by GeorgeM, May 2, 2021.

?

GTG

  1. <MS60

    1 vote(s)
    3.3%
  2. MS60

    2 vote(s)
    6.7%
  3. MS61

    1 vote(s)
    3.3%
  4. MS62

    7 vote(s)
    23.3%
  5. MS62+

    2 vote(s)
    6.7%
  6. MS63

    6 vote(s)
    20.0%
  7. MS63+

    3 vote(s)
    10.0%
  8. MS64

    5 vote(s)
    16.7%
  9. MS64+

    1 vote(s)
    3.3%
  10. MS65 or >

    3 vote(s)
    10.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. GeorgeM

    GeorgeM Well-Known Member

    NGC slab is a little scruffy & has scratches not present on the coin. I used soft light without flash to adjust for this except on the last two pictures.

    20210501_230228.jpg 20210501_225401.jpg 20210501_230245.jpg 20210501_230301.jpg 20210501_230333.jpg 20210501_230351.jpg
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2021
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Very Nice Gold piece ! I would be proud to own it no matter the grade . :happy:
     
    CoinJockey73 and GeorgeM like this.
  4. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    I will go with MS64. A Beauty with Fresh Fields. A coin with Minor nicks and Original Deep orange hues.
     
    GeorgeM likes this.
  5. CoinJockey73

    CoinJockey73 Well-Known Member

    I bet you would!
     
    Eric the Red and GeorgeM like this.
  6. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    Love the coin, but hate grading gold. That said, 63+
     
    GeorgeM likes this.
  7. GeorgeM

    GeorgeM Well-Known Member

    Btw, I picked this up, in part, based on the extremely low mintage. The Quarter Eagle doesn't seem to sell for much above melt, even in gorgeous condition in semi-key dates.

    Screenshot_20210502-081128_CoinFacts.jpg
     
    Robert Ransom likes this.
  8. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    So clean I guess <65> Is it really a 68? I can't understand this thread.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2021
  9. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Hard to tell. In one set of pictures, it looks very clean, as in 65. The other set of pictures shows a fair amount of contact marks, as in MS 62. Which set of pictures represents the actual coin?
     
    chascat and eddiespin like this.
  10. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    The first two photos had me thinking MS-64. The next two were out of focus. The last two show a lot of small scrapes and marks on the obverse which got me down to MS-62. I have seen some conservative grading for this type, especially from PCGS.
     
    capthank, chascat and Morgandude11 like this.
  11. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I put down 62, same thinking.
     
  12. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Me too. Those coins tend to grade low by PCGS, anyway.
     
    eddiespin likes this.
  13. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    I think most of those imperfections are on the holder, but I still can't see over a 65 here. Can you post some fair and honest pictures?
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2021
  14. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    It's in a NGC holder...the PCGS stats are just confusing the GTG.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  15. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    MS-62 in my opinion, the pictures are a bit confusing but overall I was able to make a decision, good luck, nice coin.
     
    capthank likes this.
  16. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I’m at a MS-63 on her. Very nice looking gold coin.
     
    capthank likes this.
  17. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    H'mm, I'm at MS-63. The first photos are the "Barbara Walters" glamour shots and the final two are probably more realistic. But I think the last two shots are probably not doing the coin justice. Ah, coin photography! If I was basing my GTG on the last two photos, I'd say MS-62 but having become familiar with @GeorgeM 's taste, I'll say it's MS-63.
     
  18. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  19. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    I gave it a fresh look and am changing my guess from around 65 to a 62. Would probably be closer with a bottle spin.
     
  20. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Here are couple of examples.

    NGC graded this 1900 quarter eagle MS-62 about 20 years ago. I bought this piece when I was high school in the mid 1960s. It was graded "BU" back then.

    1900 Quarter Eagle All.jpg

    PCGS graded this 1905 piece MS-63 about ten years ago.

    1905 250 All.jpg

    As I said before, I have seen a fair amount of conservative grading on these coins.
     
    capthank and GeorgeM like this.
  21. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page