GTG 1897 Morgan

GTG today's find...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

66

 

64+, maybe 65 if that's a minor luster break on the cheek. I don't think it will make 66 with the cheek abrasion and neck hit no matter how minor. The fields are super clean though. This is one that will be hard to acuratly grade from a static pic

 

65

 

65

 

Do they have a "Damn nice 65" grade?

 

64-65.

Steve

 

65

 

65. Fields are clean but that mark on Anna Williams' face is probably large enough to be measured with a ruler.

 

Maybe so but this one is out of the park as it's a Vam- 1C An R-6 coin Had an offer on it not an hour after I purchased it for $100. more than I paid.

 

64+++++++++++ pq wow l@@k that's a damn nice Morgan!!
Underrated date, especially in gem bu and above .....
I woulda been happier than a #%& @ a weenie roast if I found that one

 

64.

 

I'm in at a very sweet 64 . Nice find Paddy .

 

64 with a good shot at 65

 

I will post the grade in the AM, and when I do I believe that buy the coin.... not the slab or grade will hit home. The photos does not do justice to the coin . In hand this coin is spot on no question. I was watching the door at the show today the dealer next to me had this coin. His case had some really nice Morgans. I walked the room several times looking for something that was eye catching. I looked at several series I collect. While all the time my shows pick was in the case I was standing next to. This coin has eye appeal and for that reason alone I pulled the trigger .

 

Paddy54, happy for you, then.

Steve

 

@Markus1959: I think that's what 65+ is for.

 

That sounds like a hint that we've all aimed high. I'll be shocked if it says 63 on the label.

 

I am gonna say it got a 65. a light rub on the cheek.
How heavy are the marks each side of the eagle?

 

64+ very nice toning rim