Label says 64, it’s now a 65 or 65+ She has PL-like surfaces, but it’s not enough to qualify for a PL designation.
I’m fairly certain that was his guess (he’s guessing the label has a lower grade than what it would get if sent in more recently). Edit: clarified above
My bad, I thought you meant for sure it is a 64 like you knew because you've seen the coin in hand or something
PCGS pop for 1885-O in MS64: 75,871 Nope, I don’t think I’ve seen this one ;-) This Morgan has excellent luster and no significant marks, so it sure looks better than your average 64. That’s why I said it may have a shot at 65 nowadays. It’s likely that the chatter on Liberty’s cheek prevented a higher grade.
MS65 is/was my guess before I read any further posts. It's got enough " stuff " on it to keep it from going much, if any, higher. BTW, that's a technical term : " stuff ". lol
Easily, no question 65 (they didn't give Plus back then, but I think 65+ is actually the perfect grade for this coin). I think it has a good shot at 66. That is a remarkably clean cheek, which is often the problem area.
Might be the lighting in the pic, but all the black spots reduce it's eye appeal to me. I do agree that for an O mint Morgan, it has nice luster. Less "satiny" if that makes sense. Nicely struck as you can see some hair definition over the ear. Not usually the case with O mints. No guess. Nice coin.