GTG 1882 S Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BlackberryPie, Jun 8, 2020.

Page 1 of 2
  1. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

    DSC_0641 (2).JPG DSC_0642 (2).JPG
     
    BlackberryPie, Jun 8, 2020
    #1 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    MS65 PL
     
    Lehigh96, Jun 8, 2020
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. toned_morgan

    toned_morgan Toning Lover

    I'm giving this a MS66 PL
     
    toned_morgan, Jun 8, 2020
    #3 + Quote Reply
    Cazkaboom likes this.
  5. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    66 DMPL
     
    Santinidollar, Jun 8, 2020
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    65 PL
     
    Morgandude11, Jun 8, 2020
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    Nice and frosty. Those die polish lines prolly give a very proof like look. She has a pretty clean cheek with what seem like a few frost breaks. She is kind of baggy.

    I will go with 64PL. I think the contact marks limit her from a 65 but the luster may push her into 65 territory. With it being an 1882-S which may be graded more critically...

    64PL is my guess.
     
    kSigSteve, Jun 8, 2020
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm at 63 PL.
     
    ldhair, Jun 8, 2020
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. Evan Saltis

    Evan Saltis OWNER - EBS Numis LLC

    64 PL
     
    Evan Saltis, Jun 8, 2020
    #8 + Quote Reply
  10. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

    63 PL
     
    thomas mozzillo, Jun 8, 2020
    #9 + Quote Reply
  11. Legomaster1

    Legomaster1 Cointalk Patron

    MS 65 PL
     
    Legomaster1, Jun 8, 2020
    #10 + Quote Reply
  12. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    64 PL
     
    longshot, Jun 9, 2020
    #11 + Quote Reply
  13. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    64 PL
     
    Rheingold, Jun 9, 2020
    #12 + Quote Reply
  14. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    Wow. 64DMPL
     
    bradgator2, Jun 9, 2020
    #13 + Quote Reply
  15. jgrinz

    jgrinz Senior Member

    64PL
     
    jgrinz, Jun 9, 2020
    #14 + Quote Reply
  16. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    63PL
     
    furham, Jun 9, 2020
    #15 + Quote Reply
  17. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

    IMG_20200610_085107295.jpg
     
    BlackberryPie, Jun 10, 2020
    #16 + Quote Reply
    thomas mozzillo and bradgator2 like this.
  18. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Morgandude11, Jun 10, 2020
    #17 + Quote Reply
  19. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    The reverse is questionable. It’s possible that PCGS is using the + designation in a similar manner to the way that NGC uses the * designation for just miss PL coins. This is a tough coin to grade from photos.
     
    Lehigh96, Jun 10, 2020
    #18 + Quote Reply
    Morgandude11 and ddddd like this.
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    All PL and DMPL Morgans are very difficult to grade from a photograph. Looked prooflike to me, but I am not the TPG—their call.
     
    Morgandude11, Jun 10, 2020
    #19 + Quote Reply
    Lehigh96 likes this.
  21. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    That is what I thought too based on the picture.
    And I think 64+ is also a fair grade as there seem to be enough hits/marks to limit it from reaching a gem grade (although I've seen some like these get into 65 holders).
     
    ddddd, Jun 10, 2020
    #20 + Quote Reply
    Morgandude11 and Lehigh96 like this.
3 more messages...
Page 1 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page