GTG 1882 S Morgan

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

MS-64 PL

 

63DMPL

 

64PL

 

64 PL

 

Did that eagle spit out a cigarette?

 

MS-"highly altered images that don't really let you see what the coin looks like."

Is this coin yours, and are these images yours? If you own the coin, turn the contrast way down (that is, show us what the coin really looks like.).

If this coin is something you are bidding on and these are the seller's images.... I'd be cautious. There are ways to make a coin look more PL than it really is, and I strongly suspect that's what's happening here. This coin doesn't look anything like that in hand.

 

It does look like this. No contrast was messed with.

 

Here's a cellphone photo.

 

Just took this photo. Zero editing besides cropping.

 

Still 64 PL. Nothing changed my mind.

 

63PL possible DPL

 

MS65 PL

 

I’m really liking the old girl! MS64PL. In my humble opinion, the fields are much better than that, but it’s the heavy luster grazes that hold her out of gem.

@Lehigh96, it wouldn’t surprise me at all of you nailed this one.

 

I'm late but, it appears the reverse is not quite PL. There are many one siders from the '78-'82 San Fran era.

 

I'll try and get a better image of the reverse today. There are a lot of polishing lines depending on the light angles which probably held back a PL designation.

 

Here are the polishing lines that prevented the PL.

 

Nah, that didn’t prevent a PL call. To me, that coin is PL, and they blew that. In return for blowing the prooflike designation, it gets the + and a green bean.