GTG - 1852 Large Cent

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by CircCam, Oct 24, 2017.

  1. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    *Obverse scratches are on the slab @ 11-1 & 4:00, light hairlines at 9 and in the center on the reverse are also on the slab.

    I haven't attributed this yet so I'm all ears on that one.

    1852 OBV_1.png 1852 REV_1.png



    Cropped the slabs out of the slab shots to give that perspective as well:

    slabless OBV_1.PNG slabless REV_1.PNG
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2017
    old49er and Beefer518 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jerryc39

    jerryc39 Well-Known Member

    I would say XF-45 for a grade and possibly N-8 for attribution.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  4. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    These older coppers are way out of my league. I have only gut instinct to go with. I would hazard a guess of XF-45 with a shot at AU-50 on that one.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  5. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    I'm at 58, that's ignoring any scratches

    Beautiful coin!
     
    CircCam likes this.
  6. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    Very nice AU58 BN
     
    CircCam likes this.
  7. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    45
     
    CircCam likes this.
  8. NSP

    NSP Well-Known Member

    AU50? Very nice coin whatever the grade is.
     
    CircCam and chascat like this.
  9. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

  10. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    No telling what the slab grade is. Probably AU. Looking at the reverse, I'd be more at XF40 than 45. The grading for late dates is pretty strict.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  11. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    I'm terrible with old copper but I'm going to say XF45. To me...the color looks a little funny (I see reside of some kind around some of the details). Makes me wonder if it had an old cleaning or was recolored at some point. But again, I'm terrible with these coins so I could be totally wrong.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  12. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    IMG_5192.JPG
    IMG_5193.JPG

    Has a deep chestnut thing going on in hand.
     
  13. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    CircCam likes this.
  14. Mike Thorne

    Mike Thorne Well-Known Member

  15. HAB Peace 28 2.0

    HAB Peace 28 2.0 The spiders are as big as the door

  16. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    Will be revealing shortly in case anyone wants to take a last crack at it.
     
  17. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    IMG_5538_1.JPG


    Thanks for that- I had been wondering about the flatness of the stars considering the higher grade, so if that's correct it would make sense as the N-8's in MS that I've viewed share the same feature.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  18. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    That seems to be an approprite NGC grade for the coin. By EAC standards, it would be 40ish, depending on what the coin actually looks like outside of the slab.
     
  19. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    If I recall correctly, an AU grade by EAC standards isn't even possible without luster present so that sounds about right.
     
  20. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    Lunchbox John, you recall correctly.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  21. HAB Peace 28 2.0

    HAB Peace 28 2.0 The spiders are as big as the door

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page