GTG 1832 Bust Half.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ldhair, Jan 28, 2019.

  1. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Round two. Another Fun Show find.
    PCGS with a CAC.
    1832-p53-o.jpg 1832-p53-r.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

  4. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

  5. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    AU53, and O-116, I think. Very Pretty!
     
  6. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

  7. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    pretty color, a + for the color

    AU-53
     
  8. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Wow, nice pick, no matter what the grade is.
     
  9. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

  10. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    I agree with @ToughCOINS. Very nice. I still see some flow lines. IMO, 55 at least. Maybe 58.
     
  11. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I agree with the AU-53 sentiment

    On LDS capped bust halves, the flow lines were sometimes easily visible down to VF grades.
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
  12. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    AU-50. Pretty piece.
     
  13. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    A joy to hold...AU53/55
     
  14. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    The strike on this one, especially the reverse, is kinda wonky. That's making it hard to grade. I like it at 45, but I could see it going AU-50.

    What's with the weird cloudy splotchy areas in the obverse fields behind her head? The rest of the coin looks to be quite attractive, but I'm trying to figure out what's going on there.
     
  15. Magnus87

    Magnus87 Active Member

    Dunno... To me, it looks like the sort of circulation wear that usually gets an XF40, maybe 45, from the major TPG’s. But if it did, it would merit a Green Bean from CAC, IMHO.
     
  16. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    AU53 maybe 55 - a very nice coin, but not a 58 IMO; O-116 seems to be a match
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  17. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I'm going to say 45 for the heck of it, my usual disclaimer that luster is very hard to judge on static photos. Great looking coin!
     
  18. Charles REid

    Charles REid Active Member

    Touchy reverse, but still more of a strike issue. au 55
     
  19. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm sure that area got a bit of extra human intervention when the coin was cleaned.:D
     
  20. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I thought CAC didn't sticker cleaned coins. I thought that was half the point.
     
  21. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    This was one of those coins that I really wanted. It has the look I'm after.
    Old sins get forgiven.;)
     
    Cheech9712 and Nathan401 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page