GTG - 1827 Half Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by TypeCoin971793, Jul 5, 2017.

  1. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Same coin as before, but with my (mostly) accurate pictures. There is a bit of cartwheel luster subdued by the thick patina, but I am not about to dip away the original skin. The last two pictures are more accurate to in-hand appearance than the first two. The luster is extremely hard to capture.

    It is also the O-109 variety, which is rated at R4-.

    IMG_0228.JPG IMG_0229.JPG IMG_0230.JPG IMG_0231.JPG
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2017
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    I'm having a tough time on this one. I want to say MS, but there are some strike related weaknesses throwing me off. A pure guess AU-55. Lovely piece.
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  4. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    ANACS AU58?

    I grade it AU55 maybe questionable color.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2017
    lordmarcovan and TypeCoin971793 like this.
  5. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    +1, Still a Very Nice specimen and a Beauty!
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  6. mrbreeze

    mrbreeze Well-Known Member

    Definitely circulated, there are 2 thumbprints on the obverse:banghead:.


    Fitty 5 seems like a good stab.
     
    TypeCoin971793 and SchwaVB57 like this.
  7. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

  8. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    Sharp. The fingerprints are unfortunate, but that one has a lot going for it otherwise. I don't disagree with the folks who said 55, but I'll be more liberal here and go AU58.

    PS- I pretty much concur with what @C-B-D said. I have some doubts on the color, but don't totally hate it, either.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2017
    TypeCoin971793 and Paddy54 like this.
  9. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    I have to recuse myself as I found the coin in research. It would be a happy part of my collection, I'll tell you that. :)
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  10. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    So did I. I probably overpaid, but I like it.
     
  11. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    These are scarce. Keep in mind, next grade up adds a fourth digit to the price, when contemplating what you paid. :)
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  12. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  13. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    I found it as well, and if the sellers images are any indication, there's plenty of luster remaining. There images show more of a golden tone to which I am very partial.
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  14. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    The second pair of pictures is very close to in-hand appearance. Even if the color is a little funky, I like the looks of it much more than my previous AU-55.

    IMG_0040.JPG IMG_0039.JPG
     
  15. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Certainly nothing wrong with that one either, but your new one has much finer detail and just has an overall better look IMHO.
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  16. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    The 32 has much more eye appeal to me from the pictures. Both are super examples of the Bust series. As stated already, both would be welcome additions to most, if not everyone's collection.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2017
  17. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    The strong luster is very nice. However, the obverse of the 1832 really killed it for me because it looked like someone had wiped it and destroyed a lot of the luster. It has since retoned, but the obverse looked lifeless.

    But after taking what I paid for the 1832 and subtract the price difference between the two coins, I have a net $150 in the 1827, so I am not complaining.
     
    SchwaVB57 likes this.
  18. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Oof. And that is precisely why I attribute every coin I own. You just never know (and I have been surprised more than once).
     
  19. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    I must agree with @SchwaVB57 - I like the '32 more for eye appeal, despite the sharper details of the '27.

    The ideal situation in my eyes would be a coin with the details and sharpness of the '27 with the toning, coloration, and overall look of the '32.
     
    TypeCoin971793 and SchwaVB57 like this.
  20. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    This coin will tide me over for 3-4 years until I can find one as well as afford one. I like aspects of both as well, but cannot afford both at the moment.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2017
  21. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    As I stated, both are very nice and you should be ecstatic to own either! I would!
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page