GTG: 1799 Draped Bust Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Argenteus Fossil, Mar 6, 2016.

  1. Argenteus Fossil

    Argenteus Fossil Active Member

    Just arrived! I thought it would be fun to have a Guess The Grade.

    PCGS graded 1799 Draped Bust Dollar.

    1799 $1 Obverse.jpeg 1799 $1 Reverse.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

  4. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    you beat me to the same #
     
  5. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    XF-40. I've always loved that reverse.
     
  6. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    XF40 Looks Nice
     
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2016
  7. COCollector

    COCollector Well-Known Member

  8. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Nice coin. I like it also at VF35.
     
  9. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  10. UnCommonCents

    UnCommonCents Variety Collector

  11. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  12. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

  13. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

  14. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Exactly Paddy, it could go both ways... XF35/VF40 :)

    Congrats to AF, that's a wonderful piece of history!
     
  15. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Love your coin . My grade VF-35 , TPG grade 40 .
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2016
  16. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    VF35? Great looking example!
     
  17. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

  18. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    VF35.

    You're making me cry just a little bit. Here I am, trying to find one to buy in "Good" and you post this... d'oh!
     
    rzage, Argenteus Fossil and micbraun like this.
  19. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I like it at 30, but I think the reverse brought it to 35. There needs to be at least a little bit of luster present for 40, which there isn't in your pictures. Thus, based on your pictures, I strongly disagree with everyone who guessed 40 or higher.
     
  20. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Are you sure; detail from PCGS photograde XF-40. image.jpg

    Similar detail of the OPs coin.
    image.jpg

    Having said that, my initial impression was a VF-35.
     
    micbraun likes this.
  21. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    In reviewing the PCGS Photograde images for an XF40, it strikes me that the piece there has a weak strike. Look at how strong the hairlines are on the obverse except for the area that you cropped out above. Also look at how sharp the reverse is. That leads me to think that it is a striking irregularity. The OP's coin appears to have some wear evenly over all of the hairlines. This is why grading early 19th century coins can be difficult - below XF40 without any luster to guide you, it can be hard to distinguish between wear and a weak strike and it is not always straight forward. On another note, the XF40 also appears to have some luster that could have lead to the XF grade.

    For fun, does anyone know the variety/die marriage of the OP's coin? What does a typically struck exemplar from that die pair look like?
     
    Kirkuleez likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page