Grade these mercs.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Detecto92, Jul 3, 2012.

  1. Detecto92

    Detecto92 Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]
     
    Detecto92, Jul 3, 2012
    #1 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    Slider, EF40, MS-whatever
    Nice toning on that 1940.
     
    longnine009, Jul 3, 2012
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    The 1940 - Though it has nice color, it has a lot of wear. XF-AU

    The 1943 - Not as much wear as the 40, but enough to say AU

    The 1944 - BU - Gem Unc.
     
    BUncirculated, Jul 3, 2012
    #3 + Quote Reply
  5. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    I think that BUncirculated is spot on.

    XF--AU
    AU
    UNC
     
    mikenoodle, Jul 3, 2012
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. Peter T Davis

    Peter T Davis Hammer at the Ready Moderator

    I'm not seeing the wear on the 44-D. The luster seems dull, but I'd assume that's because of the way it was photographed rather than being dipped, but you can't really tell without seeing it in person IMO. Maybe my eyes are too old, but I can't see any wear on it.
     
    Peter T Davis, Jul 3, 2012
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    no, I think you're seeing it the same way as I am, Peter, but the luster doesn't seem dull, it seems non-existant. Without any luster, you can't have an AU coin let alone UNC.
     
    mikenoodle, Jul 3, 2012
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Prooflike coins wave hello. ;)
     
    Leadfoot, Jul 3, 2012
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    are you saying that prooflike coins have no luster? If not, I am missing your point, Paul
     
    mikenoodle, Jul 3, 2012
    #8 + Quote Reply
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page