Going to NGC for Appearance Review

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by LostDutchman, May 20, 2010.

  1. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    This coin is going to NGC this week for an appearance review. From the images on the NGC site this coin did not have the discoloration when it went into the slab and has discolored inside the slab. This kind of stuff happens even with slabbed coins.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I've seen this happen before with the SAE's. I think it may have something to do with the rinse used when preparing the planchets. I'm guessing they might want to send it to NCS for conservation, at their expense of course, before making a final determination. Good luck!

    Chris
     
  4. kidkayt

    kidkayt Senior Member

    I've often wondered if this would happen if the coin was not encapsulated by the TPGs. I have several 2007W ASEs ungraded in original mint packaging which are fresh, bright, and new as when I first received them.
     
  5. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Of course, it is conceivable that the planchets were rinsed improperly, but since they have remained in the capsules, perhaps they have never been exposed to the air for any length of time. Could this prolonged exposure to the air cause a reaction with the rinse? The only way to find out is to take them out of their capsules for a week or two and wait to see if anything happens.

    Chris
     
  6. Mad.Outcast

    Mad.Outcast New Member

    good luck,not sure what your expecting back,other than a clean 70 coin,reholdered.
     
  7. Good luck at NGC with the review. This is why I store my raw SAEs in Intercept Shield holders/boxes to try to delay the inevitable toning. TC
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Toning does not prevent a coin from being graded a 70.
     
  9. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    no but unattractive toning does. Eye appeal is one of the main keys to grades above MS-67.
     
  10. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    No but who gets to define unattractive toning? The tpg. And I am not sure this would qualify. At least in my opinion.
     
  11. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Typically, that type of toning is considered neutral with regards to eye appeal. I don't find it distracting at all.
     
  12. Evorlor

    Evorlor Member

    it didnt bother me till i noticed it. but now i cant look past it
     
  13. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    So is toning bad when it comes to over all grade??
     
  14. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Good luck. I hope the appearance review meets your expectations.

    Please keep us posted!
     
  15. kidkayt

    kidkayt Senior Member

    I could try to open the capsule on one of them to see what happens. I wonder also since both NGC and PCGS are coastal outfits in high pollution areas if this plays a role. Seems like the coins are processed and sealed in ambience which is not to the mints storage spec of "cool dry air."
     
  16. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    NGC? Coastal - Yes! Pollution - No! NGC built a brand new facility a few years back, and it is supposed to be state of the art. Since high humidity is common in South Florida, I seriously doubt that they would skimp on the climate control and put millions of dollars in coins at risk just to save a few bucks on the monthly utility bill.

    Chris
     
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Depends on if it is ugly toning or pretty toning. Pretty is a good thing, ugly a bad thing.
     
  18. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    This whole thing is more of an experiment then anything. I want to go through the process and report the outcome whatever it is. I have a coin that I believe has changed while in their holder and I want to see what they do with it.
     
  19. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Just curious - Can you define the tpg's definition of "pretty toning"? I do not their definitions match mine. I consider a lot of the dark black/brown toning ugly.
     
  20. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    So do I. And to be honest, I think they do too. I think the reason you see a few coins with the dark toning graded so high is because the coins are mark free and still retain their luster. But - if that toning was not dark, I feel the coins would probably grade even higher.
     
  21. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    PCGS talks about the different types of toning and their effect on grade (positive, neutral, negative) in their book THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO COIN GRADING AND COUNTERFEIT DETECTION (Chapter 5, pg 58-62).

    As you can see, the discussion is 4 pages long because it is not an easy subject to dissect. There are many types of toning and each type can show varying degrees that will affect whether the toning is considered positive or negative. However, the coin in this thread would always be considered to have light even toning. Here is an excerpt from the book about Light Even toning.

    "This type of toning is only a few microns deep, and sometimes it is difficult to see unless it is viewed under good lighting conditions. Sometimes this toning is so light that, as noted earlier, it is ignored. If a coin has good luster that blooms through a light color, this has virtually no effect on the grade"


    Defining pretty is much more difficult and much more subjective. But I guaranty that the TPG's think dark mottled toning that inhibits luster is just as ugly as you do and they do in fact penalize the grade of a coin for such toning most times. This is a quote from PCGS about Dark Even toned coins:

    "Some coins have such deep toning that PCGS will not grade them, and they are returned, unsealed, as environmentally damaged."
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page