FUN NEWP GTG: 1909S VDB Lincoln

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by physics-fan3.14, Jan 12, 2020.

?

What does the coin grade?

  1. VG-10

  2. F-12

  3. F-15

  4. VF-20

  5. VF-25

  6. VF-30

  7. VF-35

  8. EF-40

  9. EF-45

  10. AU-50

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I've been quietly working on a set of wheat cents, but I don't talk about it much. At FUN, I happened across this coin, sitting in a dealers case. I took a look at it, and loved it. I wasn't sure if I wanted to spring for it, so I called @ldhair over for a look. When he was impressed with it as well, I knew I had to have it. Well, it's mine now! This is in a problem-free NGC slab. My whole set is raw, so I'm not sure if I want to crack it or not..... but that's a decision for another day.

    I figured it might be fun to play a little GTG on this one. So give it a shot! (the mark on his forehead is a planchet flaw - this is in a problem free slab) The slab is all scratched up, so just ignore the pale white marks - they're on the plastic.

    IMG_3531.JPG IMG_3534.JPG
     
    Skyman, Paul M., CircCam and 6 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    That's a beauty. Congrats on owning one of the long sought after iconic numismatic treasures.

    I see a 40 right there.
     
  4. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I'm calling it a VF-35 on the slab. BTW, nice to meet you at FUN.
     
  5. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    Thanks for the note on the planchet void. I know that the Obverse generally sets the grade, but that Reverse looks strong. I'm with Publius on the Obverse, but think it's a 40...that reverse is just too hard to ignore. A very nice specimen!!
     
  6. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Oh, sure, this time 15 is an option. :rolleyes:

    I'm going with a technical 40, but I wonder if they netted it for the planchet flaw...?
     
  7. GSDykes

    GSDykes Well-Known Member

    EF-45
    nice coin, FUN is a long ways away from me,
    Gary in Washington
     
  8. Allan

    Allan Member

    I'm going with VF25
     
  9. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I think this is mintmark position #3. Can someone confirm that?
     
  10. robec

    robec Junior Member

    I'll go with EF-45

    I agree with yours having the #3 placement.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2020
    micbraun likes this.
  11. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    VF-35, wouldn't be surprised by a 40. Nice looking 09' S
     
  12. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I'm at s 35 on this beauty.
     
  13. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    Nice pick up! Beautiful and original surfaces. Reverse is hammered and the devices and legends really pop. I’m in the 45 camp.
     
  14. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    Calling @justafarmer. His incredible layovers are spot on for determining 09-S MM position.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  15. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    @justafarmer does some great overlays but I trust @robec knowledge of the Lincoln series all days of the week that end with Y.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  16. robec

    robec Junior Member

    Here are the 4 known S mint mark positions taken from the NGC site.

    Jason's coin is between #3 and #4 to make the comparison a little simpler.

    #2 is close, but the S is more centered between the 9 and 0 than Jason's.

    #4 is also close, but the S on that one is more to the right than Jason's.

    #1 and #2 are closer to the date than #3, #4 and Jason's.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Paul M., ddddd and Kevin Mader like this.
  17. Allan

    Allan Member

    I believe you are right
     
  18. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    MM#4 is quite a bit lower, which is why I ruled that one out. Great comparison, thanks!
     
    Pickin and Grinin and robec like this.
  19. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I went with 40
    (I could see the planchet flaw bringing it down to 35 though)
     
  20. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    You can be the best Lincoln grader, but if they decide to net grade it due to the planchet flaw, it becomes a crapshoot lol
     
    ddddd likes this.
  21. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    True
    (note: I'm nowhere near the best Lincoln grader...just in case anyone was wondering :D)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page