Found a 1982 s penny while hunting

Discussion in 'Coin Roll Hunting' started by Imthedopest1, Jul 4, 2017.

  1. Imthedopest1

    Imthedopest1 New Member

    I was wondering what this was. I have only ever found 1, 1982 s penny
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. girldly

    girldly Girldly

    Why are they so rare? Newbie
     
  4. girldly

    girldly Girldly

    Why are they so rare?
     
  5. girldly

    girldly Girldly

    I was roll hunting and found a 1906 Indian Head cent today.
     
  6. Imthedopest1

    Imthedopest1 New Member

    That's cool , i am not sure if they are rare. That's why I am asking the question.
     
  7. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    They were only issued as part of proof sets, so it's really unusual to find them in circulation.

    Nice find!
     
    Imthedopest1 likes this.
  8. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    1982 mintage of 10,712,525,000
    1982-D mintage of 6,012,979,368
    1982-S mintage of 3,857,479
    They may not be Rare, but they sure are scarce when compared with the other mints.
     
    Imthedopest1 likes this.
  9. Imthedopest1

    Imthedopest1 New Member

    Awesome thank you for the knowledge!
     
  10. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Yep. That's part of the reason you'll almost never find them in circulation (the other part is that most proof sets get kept in their boxes, rather than broken up and spent).

    Unfortunately, rare doesn't mean valuable in this case -- since there were almost four million proof sets minted, it's easy to find undamaged examples of the coin. The one you found would be considered "impaired", because it's been circulating and has gotten worn. That makes it more unusual, but not more valuable.

    But still fun!
     
    Imthedopest1 and alurid like this.
  11. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    No, the San-Francisco mint shortly opened up for circulation strikes during this time. This also cant be an impared proof because the rims arent sharp enough and the S matches neither 1982-S proof T.I or T.II. Scarcer because the SF mint produced much less than Denver and Philadelphia.
     
    Imthedopest1 likes this.
  12. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Okay, first, I didn't realize that SF issued any business-strike cents in 1982, but here are two articles that seems to support that:

    http://www.coinweek.com/education/c...-cent-provides-collectors-challenges-rewards/

    http://lincolncentsonline.com/1982 Cents.html

    However, both articles agree that none of those business-strike cents had an S mint mark.

    I see nothing to indicate that a business-strike S-mintmark cent was issued in 1982. Do you have references indicating otherwise?
     
    Imthedopest1 likes this.
  13. Imthedopest1

    Imthedopest1 New Member

    Thank you for all of the answers, I will hang onto it. If I come across another I will see if they are any different
     
  14. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    \

    1982 S was a proof only, check the Red Book
     
  15. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    I think this 1982-S could be worth in the $1 range.
    $2 if it was in better shape.
     
  16. Imthedopest1

    Imthedopest1 New Member

    Sweet! That is awesome, I will keep posting some of my finds and questions. You all are very helpful!
     
  17. Ordinary Fool

    Ordinary Fool Active Member

    The do pest 1 shoots and scores! :joyful:
     
    Imthedopest1 likes this.
  18. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    Yes, brain fart there. I think I got 70s and 80s mixed up.
     
  19. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    Does look like an impaired proof.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page