Double GTG: 1955 and 1963 Franklin

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Sean5150, Dec 23, 2015.

  1. Sean5150

    Sean5150 Well-Known Member

    Just got some coins back, why not do a twofer. Here they are:
    IMG_2698.JPG IMG_2699.JPG IMG_2685.JPG IMG_2701.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  4. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I'll go with 64 for both . No FBLs .
     
  5. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    64, AU58 (OK, the second probably got a 62+ or 63)
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2015
  6. ChangeinHistory

    ChangeinHistory Active Member

  7. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  8. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Yeah, both MS63. On the '55, the chatter on the portrait; on the '63, that cut under the bell...
     
  9. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    64, No fbl and 63plus, no fbl
     
  10. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Both 63/64 no FBL... wait those are PCGS holders...? I heard they're lenient with the FBL designation ;-)
     
  11. Sean5150

    Sean5150 Well-Known Member

    No one got the Bugs Bunny
    IMG_0262.JPG IMG_0263.JPG
     
  12. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I would have said 64 for both, no FBL. I didn't say for sure that it was bugs bunny, as it was kind of close-- some are more pronounced than others. Both are nice coins!
     
  13. Sean5150

    Sean5150 Well-Known Member

    I have no idea why they gave it FBL!
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  14. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    PCGS is more lenient on FBL than NGC in this one. NGC requires all the bell lines to be full and clear.
     
  15. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page