Does this obverse look right, or funny business ?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Ancient Aussie, Jan 12, 2020.

  1. Ancient Aussie

    Ancient Aussie Well-Known Member

    I came across this coin for sale in an auction and would like to know what you all think, especially the obverse does not look right to me having seen quite a few of this type Julia Domna's hair usually looks a lot different, any opinions? 964533_1578135087.jpg
    MOESIA INFERIOR. Marcianopolis. Caracalla, with Julia Domna (197-217). Ae.

    Obv: ANTΩNINOC AVΓOVCTOC IOVΛIA ΔOMNA.
    Confronted draped busts of Caracalla and Julia Domna.
    Rev: VΠ KVNTILIANOV MAPKIANOΠOΛITΩN / E.
    Triumphal arch surmounted by four standing figures; E (mark of value) in field to right.

    Varbanov 1041.

    Condition: Very fine.

    Weight: 11.16 g.
    Diameter: 28 mm.
    Seller's description.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Looks fine. Here are some of mine.
     
    LaCointessa likes this.
  4. Ancient Aussie

    Ancient Aussie Well-Known Member

    Here's one from CNG archives.....
    [​IMG]
    CNG 91, Lot: 491. Estimate $300.
    Sold for $550. This amount does not include the buyer’s fee.

    MOESIA INFERIOR, Marcianopolis. Caracalla, with Julia Domna. AD 198-217. Æ Pentassarion (27mm, 11.77 g, 1h). Quintilianus, legatus consularis. Struck AD 215. Confronted busts of Caracalla right, laureate, draped, and cuirassed, and Julia Domna left, draped / Arch consisting of large central bay and two smaller flanking bays supporting a large attic with two arched windows; above, four human figures standing facing; Є (mark of value) to right. H&J, Marcianopolis 6.19.46.16 (same dies as illustration); AMNG I/1, 695; Varbanov 1041-2 corr. (should be combined under one entry). Near EF, green patina, light cleaning marks on reverse, tiny scuff on bay to right. Rare type.
     
    LaCointessa likes this.
  5. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    It’s been heavily tooled.

    Barry Murphy
     
  6. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    That is my thought as well.
     
    Ancient Aussie likes this.
  7. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    I should have considered tooling. By comparing the shapes of the devices to my worn examples, I was falsely reassured by the apparent die-match.

    Thanks, @Barry Murphy , for the lesson.
     
    Black Friar and Ancient Aussie like this.
  8. frankjg

    frankjg Well-Known Member

    Was it in a certain auction from yesterday that had many tooled examples that went unmentioned by the auction house?
     
  9. SeptimusT

    SeptimusT Well-Known Member

    I think that auction's 'restoration professional' wishes theirs looked this good...
     
    Ancient Aussie likes this.
  10. ancient coin hunter

    ancient coin hunter 3rd Century Usurper

    Lettering is a dead giveaway to the tooling.
     
    Ancient Aussie likes this.
  11. Ancient Aussie

    Ancient Aussie Well-Known Member

  12. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Tooled and smoothed
     
    Ancient Aussie likes this.
  13. Ancient Aussie

    Ancient Aussie Well-Known Member

    To Numismatic Naumann's credit they have withdrawn the coin from the auction.
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page