Does this look PL or DPL to you?

I'm on the fence if it's even PL. The Rev looks like it could be but the Obv looks hazed over. The photos suck too and the seller doesn't have better.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Well heck, those are (fug?) ugly pics. If you rely on them then you're gonna be squired like a Louisiana pig......

 

Skewered?

 

Too bad it's in a gsa. That girl needs a bath. Yes looks pl possibly dmpl but the haze could prevent the designation. Assuming I'm reading the less than stellar pics correctly

 

The reverse appears to be worthy of PL but the obverse looks like it falls short.

 

Without the haze, perhaps. But the haze literally muddles up the sight.

 

Until better photos surface, bite your tongue.

 

Sheesh, you guys are really buying it?

 

Let's get the master to chime in on this one... @blu62vette

 

Well, if those aRE HIS ORIGINALS , i'M SADLY DISAPPOINTED.......

 

And the cap's key sucks.......

 

Sorry.

 

Enrolls Green in 7 step program . Where the cap key never sucks.....it may stick, but if you say" serenity now"..... breathe in breathe out and move on...... you'll feel a lot better .

 

Been hit'n the scotch already green?

Todd's very_first_coin_photo was probably better than those by a factor of 10 or more

 

I don't remember a day at the keyboard when I didn't type at least half of one post in all caps before I caught myself.

The photography technique which can offer any more than a vague estimation of mirrors, much less differentiate between PL/DMPL, hasn't been invented yet. It's all a crapshoot.

 

Not PL but maybe a star if NGC.

 

Doesn't look like a PL to me.

 

Just need better images to make a determination.

 

Tried to make my reply as vague as the photos.

 

Pure guesses:

Likelihood it gets PL - 50%
Likelihood it get DMPL - 5%

That's working from what we have before us.