did i finally find my missing clad?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by xeno108, May 30, 2007.

  1. xeno108

    xeno108 New Member

    I was changing out somebody's till at work today, shut the till... then did a "did i just see what I think I just saw?" opened it back up and paid .10 for it...

    whatcha guys think? did patience and consistence pay off?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. xeno108

    xeno108 New Member

    wait... here are some more pix
     

    Attached Files:

  4. CoinNewb3

    CoinNewb3 New Member

    When side by side with another dime is it thinner? If it is great nab :smile
     
  5. dak

    dak The Nickel Nut

    Sorry but it looks normal to me, appears to be a little corroded is all... imho
     
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    xeno
    the first picture didn't impress, however, the picture of the rim, well, that is another story.
    Maybe, perhaps, could be the real thing.
     
  7. Henry

    Henry Member

    What is the real thnig? I collect old coins. What is it that this coin maybe?
     
  8. gopher29

    gopher29 Coin Hoarder

    Yeah, what's the deal with that dime?
     
  9. Dockwalliper

    Dockwalliper Coin Hoarder

    The missing clads I have seen the outside layer popped off. This appears to be more like a planchet error.
     
  10. satootoko

    satootoko Retired

    xeno108 is asking for opinions on whether his dime is a "missing clad" error. Those occur when one "slice of bread" is missing from the clad "sandwich", resulting in a thinner coin that appears to be copper on one side and cu-ni on the other.

    If the answer to CoinNewb3's question is affirmative, I think it probably is such an error, even though the ones I've seen in hand (commencing with a bi-centennial quarter I found in an original mint bag when they first came out) all seem to have a more even color than the one pictured.

    I'm inclined to believe that circulation accounts for the slightly blotchy reverse appearance, so I'm anxiously awaiting word on the thickness of the coin. :thumb:(I hope!)
     
  11. Henry

    Henry Member

    Thank you for the knowledge....:)
     
  12. hamman88

    hamman88 Spare some change, sir?

    I looks to be the right thickness but is still missing the outer layer.
     
  13. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    Weigh it. If weighs around 1.9 grams, then it's an authentic missing clad error. If it's the normal weight (2.27g) then it's just discolored. From the looks of it, the latter seems more likely. In the close-up, the high points of the design are worn and this wear has exposed nickel-colored metal. The overall uneven color is also a bad sign. The blotchy obverse is yet another.
     
  14. satootoko

    satootoko Retired

    Worst possible news. :(
     
  15. xeno108

    xeno108 New Member

    i finally found my micrometer guys... here's the results
    test dimes:
    1994: .054"
    1995: .055"

    the dime in question (1996): .052"... just slightly thinner

    will a local coin dealer weigh it for free you think? (maybe if i ask after buying something?)
     
  16. The_Cave_Troll

    The_Cave_Troll The Coin Troll


    I'd certainly expect him to. If it is more convenient then maybe go to a jeweler, I've had good luck getting things weighed there before.
     
  17. dak

    dak The Nickel Nut

    If we are talking 2-3 thousandths of an inch, that can easily be accounted for in the form of wear from circulation, weigh it, I'd love to be proven wrong, but I think its safe to say its just a normal run of the mill dime that has been a bit used and abused... Sorry ... :(
     
  18. gopher29

    gopher29 Coin Hoarder

    Sure, I've never heard of a coin dealer or Jeweler that wouldn't give a free appraisel and weight for a customer. It's a common courtesy in the industry.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page