Constantius II - Fallen Horseman - Attribution help, please?

I have, (with help), narrowed the attribution of this coin down to either
CONSTANTIUS II RIC VIII Siscia 342 or CONSTANTIUS II RIC VIII Siscia 344.
Can anyone tell me , please, which one it is (and why?).

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

The difference between the two is the mintmark.

342 is •ASIS palm branch and 344 is •ASIS•

On yours, I can see the first •, but can't make out the rest.

 

I agree. Therein lies my problem.
I was (sort of) hoping that there might be another way of defining which it is.

 

yeah TC, this one isn't going to pan out for a full attribution, but you know it's a siscia mint constantius ii fallen horseman...so I wouldn't loose any sleep about not knowing the details beyond that.

 

Agreed, Chris, but I don't like writing on the card 342 or 344.
Might be one to 'sell', (when I get around to selling any).
Thanks.

 

If you could find a die match

 

@randygeki
There's a thought.
Thank-you.

 

Sell it to someone who does not worship RIC. Die duplicates in this period are not easy to find. They made a lot of coins and used many dies.

 

I was with you, right up until you said "Đêm ... "

 

I agreee!