Must be quite the difference in grading practices . How else could a coin go from 58 to 63 . Wouldn't conservation remove details from the coin ?
Not at all. In fact, it often will better reveal them. However, something that everyone should be aware of if you want to have a coin conserved is that sometimes by conserving a coin and removing debris, toning, surface Grime, PVC, or other unwanted substance, is that at times it can also reveal something you don't want to be shown. For example, sometimes with that other stuff you remove through conservation, you will also possibly reveal a scratch, a gouge, or pitting that was well hidden before, and now it is blatantly obvious and unattractive.
99% of the time I am as well, but this one was kinda ugly on the obverse. Wasnt sure if what was on there would continue to progress or even damage it
I think that's just an amazing restoration. Even the luster is so close unchanged and now it looks like an original fresh surface, nearly frosty...I see that tiny spot at noon on the reverse but wowee If I was being super critical I would lean towards MS62 lol...but so what it's lovely.
I think you made the right call. Conservation on this piece was needed as the toning was becoming terminal. Yes conservation can be a roll of the dice. The out come in this instance speaks for itself. This coin has been preserved for future generations to enjoy. Bravo!
Thanks for this, Joe. It's worth knowing especially when a hobbyist is on the fence about a conservation. The gamble to improve appearances without revealing other detractors could be the difference between a grade that justifies slabbing vs. not slabbing a coin. A roll of the dice, especially if a coin is about to turn problematic, could payoff nicely.
