Cents 1986d, 1989d, 1956d

Came across these CRH. Looking for some opinions on these as I have searched around trying to determine what I have for certain. If I'm wrong, no thin skin here. 1956d obverse error. Not sure what it what it would fall under but does not look like damage to me. 1986 d OMM. 1989d DDR? Part of me says MD.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

The 1986

 

‘56-D...damage.
‘86-D...corrosion.
‘89-D...split-plate doubling and environmental damage.
...jmho...Spark

 

I agree that the first one is just damage. Copper, being so soft, can be displaced and through circulation wear, the flattened part was worn smooth. JMHO
The others are examples of the crappy Zincoln cent and will self-destruct in time.

 

Strikes 1,2, & 3. And the rookie leaves the bases loaded. Ha

 

Strikes 1,2, & 3. And the rookie leaves the bases loaded. Ha